您的当前位置:首页 >百科 >【】Tweet may have been deleted 正文
时间:2025-10-08 00:02:06 来源:网络整理编辑:百科
Unless you're involuntarily locked in the cellar of some Berkeley farm cooperative, being a Trump su
Unless you're involuntarily locked in the cellar of some Berkeley farm cooperative, being a Trump supporter does not make you an oppressed minority in America. At least according to one judge. 。
Tell that to Philadelphia accountant Greg Piatek, who sued The Happiest Hour bar in New York City after the bar allegedly kicked him out for wearing the infamous red Make America Great Again hat. 。
Piatek claimed that MAGA was his religion, and that he was a victim of religious discrimination when the bar kicked him out for expressing his spiritual beliefs.。
On Wednesday, Manhattan Supreme Court Justice David Cohen ruled that the bar's ejection was legal, as MAGA is technically not a religion. 。
“Anyone who supports Trump — or believes in what you believe — is not welcome here," Piatek claims the bartender at The Happiest Hour told him. "And you need to leave right now because we won’t serve you'”
Piatek alleges that the bartender ejected him only after he and his friends complained about poor service. 。
State discrimination laws do not protect Americans from political discrimination. Discrimination laws do, however, protect customers from religious discrimination. 。
Thanks for signing up!。
Tweet may have been deleted。
“He was paying spiritual tribute to the victims of 9/11. The Make American Great Again hat was part of his spiritual belief," Piatek's lawyer, Paul Liggieri, told Judge Cohen.。
“How many members are in this spiritual program that your client is engaged in?
“How many members are in this spiritual program that your client is engaged in?” Judge David Cohen asked. 。
“Your honor, we don’t allege the amount of individuals,” Liggieri said. 。
“So, it’s a creed of one?”
“Yes, your honor,” Liggieri said. 。
Piatek's suit for emotional damages was denied when the judge ruled that the bar's behavior didn't represent "outrageous conduct" and that the “plaintiff does not state any faith-based principle to which the hat relates.”
Apparently Judge David Cohen doesn't have any respect for my uncle's Religion, "Temple of the Bucket Hat." Shame on him.。
MashReads Podcast: What makes a good summer read?2025-10-07 23:42
These Disney2025-10-07 23:27
You can make your Samsung Galaxy S8 transparent, but there's a catch2025-10-07 22:48
Damn, Elon Musk's underground tunnels look slick in new video2025-10-07 22:43
Olympics official on Rio's green diving pool: 'Chemistry is not an exact science'2025-10-07 21:43
'47 Meters Down' is the Mandy Moore shark movie we didn't know we wanted2025-10-07 21:36
Colin Kaepernick's noble deeds keep making haters look like bitter fools2025-10-07 21:23
Teenagers are taking breaks from social media —but are you?2025-10-07 21:21
U.S. government issues warning on McDonald's recalled wearable devices2025-10-07 21:21
Isaiah Thomas gets tooth knocked out, dominates Wizards anyway2025-10-07 21:17
Two astronauts just installed a new parking spot on the International Space Station2025-10-07 23:00
Frog scares the crap out of dog and 2 humans, doggo goes back for toy2025-10-07 22:48
Frog scares the crap out of dog and 2 humans, doggo goes back for toy2025-10-07 22:47
Teenagers are taking breaks from social media —but are you?2025-10-07 22:11
Tesla's rumored P100D could make Ludicrous mode even more Ludicrous2025-10-07 21:52
How to watch Microsoft's #MicrosoftEDU event live2025-10-07 21:50
Surprise! U.S. Senate email lacks the most basic of security features.2025-10-07 21:43
When it comes to finding dates, these jobs always win2025-10-07 21:36
Here's George Takei chilling in zero gravity for the 'Star Trek' anniversary2025-10-07 21:28
Nature to greet People's Climate March with record heat2025-10-07 21:20