您的当前位置:首页 >知識 >【】UPDATE: Sept. 7, 2016, 4:41 p.m. EDT 正文
时间:2026-07-11 00:51:33 来源:网络整理编辑:知識
UPDATE: Sept. 7, 2016, 4:41 p.m. EDT。 A ruling in a different case on Wednesday, Sept. 7 may have ch
UPDATE: Sept. 7, 2016, 4:41 p.m. EDT。
A ruling in a different case on Wednesday, Sept. 7 may have changed the course of Uber's fight over its use of contractors.。
An appeals court ruled that drivers suing over background check practices must fight their cases separately, rather than in a class-action suit. That's because the court upheld an arbitration agreement in the drivers' contracts.。
The ruling could be used to disband the class-action case in O'Connor v. Uber.。

Without the power of a large class-action suit, Uber drivers will be unlikely to win any changes to their status as contractors.。
A $100 million settlement Uber was ordered to pay to drivers in a class-action lawsuit may not be enough, a judge said Thursday.。
Uber had agreed to pay $100 million to drivers in California and Massachusetts who sued over their status as contractors, rather than employees. 。
Keeping drivers as contractors, not eligible for benefits or other protections for full-time workers, has been instrumental in Uber's astronomical growth and business model. Settling class-action lawsuits over the issue for $100 million allowed Uber to move forward with its business model intact.。
The case has also been closely watched in Silicon Valley due to the possibility that the case will impact the broader on-demand economy.。
But a judge hinted in June that the settlement might not be enough on Uber's part. And on Thursday U.S. District Court Judge Edward Chen rejected the settlement deal. 。
Thanks for signing up! 。
Chen cited a prior ruling from the California Labor Commission that said that Uber had to treat a driver as a full-time employee. 。
Uber could be in line for a bigger financial hit as long as the ruling is upheld and the case moves forward. Chen said in his ruling that the $100 million settlement — $16 million of which was projected based on a future IPO from Uber — was not enough. 。
He pointed to a few reasons, noting that he did believe that "the change to tipping policy will result in 'substantially increased income'" that had been promised.。
Chen also noted that the $16 million for the IPO could not be considered a reasonable sum as "there is no information on the likelihood that this contingency will be triggered."。 But it's possible the lawsuit could collapse and Uber would walk away without paying the 385,000 drivers anything, as。 But it's possible the lawsuit could collapse and Uber would walk away without paying the 385,000 drivers anything, as。
Bloomberg 。
pointed out.。
Uber drivers had previously been under an "arbitration agreement" that meant any lawsuit filed against Uber would be mediated not in a court but rather in arbitration, a private process that is usually quicker and often favors companies.。
Chen threw out the arbitration agreement, allowing the lawsuit to proceed in court. Uber has appealed that decision, and if it wins, could face a far smaller class-action lawsuit. The lawyer for the drivers has said this would be disastrous for their case and give Uber the upper hand. 。
The judge acknowledged that risk, but did not find it strong enough to uphold the settlement.。
"In addition to this risk to maintaining class action status, as this Court has previously noted, Plaintiffs face risks on the merits of the case. The fundamental question of whether Uber drivers are employees or independent contractors is not a simple one," the judge wrote. 。
The ruling comes on the same day Uber said it would roll out its first driverless cars in Pittsburgh. And they won't be able to sue. 。
When reached for comment, an Uber spokesperson emailed the following statement: "The settlement, mutually agreed by both sides, was fair and reasonable. We’re disappointed in this decision and are taking a look at our options." 。
This post was updated to reflect the new case ruling that may impact the original story. 。
This post was updated to reflect the new case ruling that may impact the original story. 。
These glasses hide a fitness tracker on your face2026-07-11 00:39
Tom Arnold waxes lyrical about Trump's alleged racial slur tape in the jungle2026-07-11 00:22
Get your feet wet as a marine biologist in a VR coral reef2026-07-10 23:59
Get your feet wet as a marine biologist in a VR coral reef2026-07-10 23:56
MashReads Podcast: What makes a good summer read?2026-07-10 23:55
Oakland Raiders roast each other on Twitter with savage celebrity look2026-07-10 23:12
Snapchat just released a 352026-07-10 23:06
Hannah Hart's first project in new movie deal: An LGBTQ rom2026-07-10 22:55
You will love/hate Cards Against Humanity's new fortune cookies2026-07-10 22:41
Canon embraces vloggers with EOS M6, EOS Rebel T7i and EOS 77D2026-07-10 22:30
This chart shows just how high Simone Biles can jump2026-07-11 00:49
Snapchat just released a 352026-07-11 00:41
Japanese experiment proves that cleaning up space junk is hard2026-07-11 00:13
These twins battled each other for 58 words in the final round of a spelling bee2026-07-11 00:06
Wikipedia co2026-07-11 00:05
Apple teases a new show that's basically 'Shark Tank' for apps plus celebrities2026-07-10 23:55
The Washington Post hunts younger readers, launching on Snapchat Discover2026-07-10 23:51
The 10 most iconic Maxine Waters moments2026-07-10 23:25
17 questions you can answer if you're a good communicator2026-07-10 23:07
Japan is rolling out these hilariously obvious signs to help clueless tourists2026-07-10 22:23