时间:2025-05-01 16:41:03 来源:网络整理编辑:探索
Smart speakers are error prone, leak personally identifiable information, and line the pockets of ba
Smart speakers are error prone, leak personally identifiable information, and line the pockets of bad actors like Facebook and Amazon. That said, if the worst person in your life still insists on owning one, the least you can do is buy them an Alexa-jamming device.
Say hello to Alexagate, a new ultrasonic speaker that fits neatly on top of most Alexa-enabled smart speakers. The idea is simple enough: while turned on and placed on top of your device, Alexagate uses "pulsed ultrasound to jam the Echo's microphone."
You clap three times to turn it on, and another three to turn it off.
"It is possible to shout through Alexagate's blocking, but we could only do it from about six inches away, yelling until our throats were hoarse," reads the product's FAQ. "Believe us when we say that the blocking is good."
The device costs $99, and is made by MSCHF — a novelty product company profiled by Business Insider in January — apparently for people too young to remember The Clapper.
The Alexagate is the latest in an ever-growing line of add-ons meant to protect you from the prying ears of your smart device. The best of which — a bracelet which emits ultrasonic noise to interfere with the microphones common on smart speakers — is meant to be taken with you, but is unfortunately not for sale. Notably, all these privacy-focused devices take as a given that smart speakers are recording users — even when not triggered by wake phrases like "Hey Google" — and represent a fundamental violation of users' privacy.
It's unclear, then, why the simpler, and more effective solution, is not offered for sale: that of a hammer.
SEE ALSO: The secret workforce that does the tedious work of the online economy
True, barring those who rely on smart speakers for accessibility reasons, the out-of-touch people who actually own Echos and Google Homes may take more kindly to an Alexagate gift than you wandering around their home and smashing their invasive electronics.
But hey, a return to some moderate semblance of privacy has to start somewhere — a fact that MSCHF is clearly counting on.
TopicsAlexaAmazonAmazon EchoCybersecurityPrivacy
Fiji wins first2025-05-01 16:09
Paying for porn should be the post2025-05-01 16:08
'Pokémon Smile' review: my teeth are clean and I have questions2025-05-01 16:06
Turns out 'Red Dead Redemption 2' is a perfect platform for work meetings2025-05-01 15:38
Darth Vader is back. Why do we still care?2025-05-01 15:16
'House of the Dragon' Season 2, episode 4: Is Aegon dead?2025-05-01 15:14
Windows 11 Notepad gets spellcheck, autocorrect 41 years later2025-05-01 15:07
Your favorite bands from your teenage years are great at making memes now2025-05-01 14:27
Tributes flow after death of former Singapore president S.R. Nathan2025-05-01 14:14
Shirley Jackson biopic on Hulu is surprisingly fun and sexy: Review2025-05-01 14:02
WhatsApp announces plans to share user data with Facebook2025-05-01 16:40
Facebook launches 'Facebook Shops' for more in2025-05-01 16:12
Signal's new blur tool will help hide protesters' identities2025-05-01 16:07
NYT's The Mini crossword answers for July 82025-05-01 15:58
Honda's all2025-05-01 15:26
Amazon Prime Day 2024: How to find the best deals2025-05-01 14:37
Best Apple Watch deals: Target Circle Week Apple deals2025-05-01 14:33
How to use Apple Pay on Amazon ahead of Prime Day 20242025-05-01 14:30
Daughter gives her 1002025-05-01 14:27
The 'Joe Rogan Experience' podcast will soon be exclusive to Spotify2025-05-01 13:54