时间：2026-03-20 09:58:57 来源：网络整理编辑：熱點
The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) might be stepping up the country's AI enforcement mechan
The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) might be stepping up the country's AI enforcement mechanisms, as the organization explores new rules for disclosing the use of AI in political ads.
According to a new Notice of Proposed Rulemaking released this week, the commission is beginning initial investigations into nationwide requirements for labeling AI used in political advertising on TV and radio. The FCC will explore mandates for live, on-air and written AI disclosures and, most divisively, will work to define the scope of "AI-generated content."
Proposed rules could apply to cable operators, satellite TV providers, and radio providers, but would not affect internet streaming services.
"The use of AI is expected to play a substantial role in the creation of political ads in 2024 and beyond, but the use of AI-generated content in political ads also creates a potential for providing deceptive information to voters, in particular, the potential use of 'deep fakes' – altered images, videos, or audio recordings that depict people doing or saying things that did not actually do or say, or events that did not actually occur," the FCC writes. The rules would leverage powers provided to the FCC via the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act.
FCC chairwoman Jessica Rosenworcel called on fellow regulators to explore AI safety in the proposal's news release, writing, "As artificial intelligence tools become more accessible, the Commission wants to make sure consumers are fully informed when the technology is used. Today, I’ve shared with my colleagues a proposal that makes clear consumers have a right to know when AI tools are being used in the political ads they see, and I hope they swiftly act on this issue.”
Notably, the FCC's proposal isn't exploring an outright ban of AI-altered content in political advertising, despite growing concern, and the proposed rule making process will not result in a finalized set of requirements for at least several months.
Until then, the onus for AI labeling sits with individual companies and AI developers themselves.
TopicsArtificial IntelligenceFCCSocial GoodPolitics
Honda's all2026-03-20 09:50
Wikipedia prepares for election day misinformation2026-03-20 09:46
Thanksgiving and COVID2026-03-20 09:42
Twitter 'exploring' adding a dislike button or downvote system2026-03-20 09:08
Visualizing July's astounding global temperature records2026-03-20 08:48
Happily never after: Why more romantic comedies need to embrace 'ending up' alone2026-03-20 08:32
Why the next presidential debate could totally be on Zoom2026-03-20 08:27
iFixit teardown confirms the iPhone 12 and 12 Pro are mostly identical2026-03-20 08:24
Chinese gymnastics team horrifies crowd with human jump rope2026-03-20 07:59
Trump left a note for Biden in the White House and the memes write themselves2026-03-20 07:40
'Rocket League' Championship Series Season 2 offers $250,000 prize pool2026-03-20 09:50
'The Mandalorian' births a new internet STAR: Mon Cal in a sweater2026-03-20 09:47
'Zack Snyder's Justice League' lands on HBO Max in March2026-03-20 09:38
10 Halloween costumes you really shouldn't wear this year2026-03-20 08:37
Honda's all2026-03-20 08:35
Discord bans r/WallStreetBets server for 'hateful and discriminatory content'2026-03-20 08:33
The best tech of 20202026-03-20 08:29
Netflix's 'Kingdom' makes zombies feel fresh in 16th century Korea2026-03-20 08:14
Donald Trump's tangled web of Russian influence2026-03-20 07:57
How to watch Apple's 'One More Thing' event2026-03-20 07:42
