时间:2025-05-01 10:32:30 来源:网络整理编辑:熱點
The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) might be stepping up the country's AI enforcement mechan
The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) might be stepping up the country's AI enforcement mechanisms, as the organization explores new rules for disclosing the use of AI in political ads.
According to a new Notice of Proposed Rulemaking released this week, the commission is beginning initial investigations into nationwide requirements for labeling AI used in political advertising on TV and radio. The FCC will explore mandates for live, on-air and written AI disclosures and, most divisively, will work to define the scope of "AI-generated content."
Proposed rules could apply to cable operators, satellite TV providers, and radio providers, but would not affect internet streaming services.
"The use of AI is expected to play a substantial role in the creation of political ads in 2024 and beyond, but the use of AI-generated content in political ads also creates a potential for providing deceptive information to voters, in particular, the potential use of 'deep fakes' – altered images, videos, or audio recordings that depict people doing or saying things that did not actually do or say, or events that did not actually occur," the FCC writes. The rules would leverage powers provided to the FCC via the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act.
FCC chairwoman Jessica Rosenworcel called on fellow regulators to explore AI safety in the proposal's news release, writing, "As artificial intelligence tools become more accessible, the Commission wants to make sure consumers are fully informed when the technology is used. Today, I’ve shared with my colleagues a proposal that makes clear consumers have a right to know when AI tools are being used in the political ads they see, and I hope they swiftly act on this issue.”
Notably, the FCC's proposal isn't exploring an outright ban of AI-altered content in political advertising, despite growing concern, and the proposed rule making process will not result in a finalized set of requirements for at least several months.
Until then, the onus for AI labeling sits with individual companies and AI developers themselves.
TopicsArtificial IntelligenceFCCSocial GoodPolitics
MashReads Podcast: What makes a good summer read?2025-05-01 09:26
Ignore this guy's dumbbell trick and check out the NBA star grandpa behind him2025-05-01 09:22
Fans are obsessing over this image of Hailey Baldwin sitting on the toilet2025-05-01 09:10
Twitter is loosening up its 1402025-05-01 09:05
MashReads Podcast: What makes a good summer read?2025-05-01 09:01
You might soon be able to order and pick up Starbucks without talking to a single damn human being2025-05-01 08:56
Jack Dorsey's Square launches in the UK2025-05-01 08:46
Oxford University is shaking up all those portraits of white men on its walls2025-05-01 08:39
Over 82,000 evacuate as Blue Cut fire rapidly spreads in southern California2025-05-01 08:21
In Wales there are so many castles that wedding guests turn up at the wrong one2025-05-01 08:14
'Rocket League' Championship Series Season 2 offers $250,000 prize pool2025-05-01 10:20
WhatsApp and encrypted messaging targeted in UK2025-05-01 10:07
The wait is over: Hillary Clinton is back and political as hell2025-05-01 09:36
Infowars apologizes for spreading #Pizzagate conspiracy2025-05-01 09:30
J.K. Rowling makes 'Harry Potter' joke about Olympics event2025-05-01 09:15
BioWare finally addresses its questionable handling of a trans character in 'Mass Effect'2025-05-01 09:15
India's 'anti2025-05-01 09:10
Kid who can't handle being grounded for a day overreacts like only a 9 year old can2025-05-01 08:47
This German startup wants to be your bank (without being a bank)2025-05-01 08:44
AmazonFresh will now deliver your groceries directly to your car2025-05-01 08:41