时间:2025-09-16 22:26:50 来源:网络整理编辑:娛樂
Apparently Facebook hoaxes are still alive and well in the year 2016. An old one is making the round
Apparently Facebook hoaxes are still alive and well in the year 2016.
An old one is making the rounds this week, and everyone really needs to stop freaking out. The hoax tells Facebook users to repost a paragraphs-long status to to ensure their privacy.
The two statuses, per CBS News:
As of September 28th , 2015 at 10:50p.m. Eastern standard time, I do not give Facebook or any entities associated with Facebook permission to use my pictures, information, or posts, both past and future. By this statement, I give notice to Facebook it is strictly forbidden to disclose, copy, distribute, or take any other action against me based on this profile and/or its contents. The content of this profile is private and confidential information. The violation of privacy can be punished by law (UCC 1-308- 1 1 308-103 and the Rome Statute).
NOTE: Facebook is now a public entity. All members must post a note like this. If you prefer, you can copy and paste this version. If you do not publish a statement at least once it will be tactically allowing the use of your photos, as well as the information contained in the profile status updates.
And:
Now it's official! It has been published in the media. Facebook has just released the entry price: £5.99 ($9.10) to keep the subscription of your status to be set to "private." If you paste this message on your page, it will be offered free (I said paste not share) if not tomorrow, all your posts can become public. Even the messages that have been deleted or the photos not allowed. After all, it does not cost anything for a simple copy and paste.
In case you still had questions, no, reposting either of these statuses will not protect you from any Facebook encroachment on your privacy.
According to Snopes, the hoaxes go back to at least 2012. The claim behind the statuses isn't true, Snopessaid, since Facebook does not claim copyright to personal information and has not indicated any plans to make private accounts public.
In any case, posting a status would not counteract the legal agreement every Facebook user must check before signing up for an account.
This time around, people are noticing the statuses and posting to warn others of the hoaxes more quickly than in years past. (Not that that's particularly useful either.)
Maybe endorse a candidate for president instead.
TopicsCybersecurityFacebookPrivacy
Major earthquake and multiple aftershocks rock central Italy2025-09-16 22:10
'Our Flag Means Death' heals the wounds of SuperWhoLocke queerbaiting2025-09-16 21:58
Apple confirms WWDC 2022 begins June 62025-09-16 21:46
How to see an eerie total lunar eclipse in the sky this weekend2025-09-16 21:40
This chart shows just how high Simone Biles can jump2025-09-16 21:27
Pinterest bans climate misinformation2025-09-16 20:53
'Wordle' today: Here's the answer, hints for April 122025-09-16 20:50
2022 dating trends: Prioridating, vulnerability, sober curious dating2025-09-16 20:32
Australian football makes history with first LGBT Pride Game2025-09-16 20:06
'Wordle' takes over TikTok2025-09-16 19:43
Did our grandparents have the best beauty advice?2025-09-16 22:26
Bill Hader's 'Barry' Season 3 is back, and we've never needed this show more2025-09-16 21:43
Maserati goes all in on electric with 5 new EVs2025-09-16 21:41
Watch Rocket Lab try to catch a booster as it falls back to Earth2025-09-16 21:24
New Zealand designer's photo series celebrates the elegance of aging2025-09-16 21:23
NASA spots dry ice and gullies in a Martian crater2025-09-16 21:01
Maserati goes all in on electric with 5 new EVs2025-09-16 20:34
Steam Deck tips: Essential shortcuts, including a way to view the whole shortcut list2025-09-16 20:29
Despite IOC ban, Rio crowds get their political messages across2025-09-16 20:28
9 most random new emoji and how to use them2025-09-16 20:12