时间:2026-04-08 17:05:14 来源:网络整理编辑:熱點
Apparently Facebook hoaxes are still alive and well in the year 2016. An old one is making the round
Apparently Facebook hoaxes are still alive and well in the year 2016.
An old one is making the rounds this week, and everyone really needs to stop freaking out. The hoax tells Facebook users to repost a paragraphs-long status to to ensure their privacy.
The two statuses, per CBS News:
As of September 28th , 2015 at 10:50p.m. Eastern standard time, I do not give Facebook or any entities associated with Facebook permission to use my pictures, information, or posts, both past and future. By this statement, I give notice to Facebook it is strictly forbidden to disclose, copy, distribute, or take any other action against me based on this profile and/or its contents. The content of this profile is private and confidential information. The violation of privacy can be punished by law (UCC 1-308- 1 1 308-103 and the Rome Statute).
NOTE: Facebook is now a public entity. All members must post a note like this. If you prefer, you can copy and paste this version. If you do not publish a statement at least once it will be tactically allowing the use of your photos, as well as the information contained in the profile status updates.
And:
Now it's official! It has been published in the media. Facebook has just released the entry price: £5.99 ($9.10) to keep the subscription of your status to be set to "private." If you paste this message on your page, it will be offered free (I said paste not share) if not tomorrow, all your posts can become public. Even the messages that have been deleted or the photos not allowed. After all, it does not cost anything for a simple copy and paste.
In case you still had questions, no, reposting either of these statuses will not protect you from any Facebook encroachment on your privacy.
According to Snopes, the hoaxes go back to at least 2012. The claim behind the statuses isn't true, Snopessaid, since Facebook does not claim copyright to personal information and has not indicated any plans to make private accounts public.
In any case, posting a status would not counteract the legal agreement every Facebook user must check before signing up for an account.
This time around, people are noticing the statuses and posting to warn others of the hoaxes more quickly than in years past. (Not that that's particularly useful either.)
Maybe endorse a candidate for president instead.
TopicsCybersecurityFacebookPrivacy
Richard Branson 'thought he was going to die' in bike accident2026-04-08 16:41
Want to learn and share more about local Black history? Start with Google Maps.2026-04-08 16:09
I tried the viral TikTok adjustable buttons and they actually work pretty well2026-04-08 15:54
How climate change impacted Hurricane Ida, according to scientists2026-04-08 15:35
Tributes flow after death of former Singapore president S.R. Nathan2026-04-08 14:57
'Dune: Part Two' is officially happening2026-04-08 14:52
20 years later, 'Donnie Darko' feels finally fit for our times2026-04-08 14:38
The dateable weapons of 'Boyfriend Dungeon', ranked2026-04-08 14:37
Satisfy your Olympics withdrawals with Nike's latest app2026-04-08 14:32
YouTube Premium Lite could get rid of ads for less money than Premium2026-04-08 14:31
Honda's all2026-04-08 16:54
So, you're worried about your boob(s)2026-04-08 16:41
The dateable weapons of 'Boyfriend Dungeon', ranked2026-04-08 16:34
Apple Watch Series 7 might get a bigger, flatter screen2026-04-08 16:31
Metallica to seek and destroy your eardrums with new album this fall2026-04-08 15:55
Apple Store goes down ahead of 'California Streaming' event2026-04-08 15:43
'Shang2026-04-08 15:39
10 best tweets of the week, including kindly ape, mouth bugs, and Windows 102026-04-08 15:12
WhatsApp announces plans to share user data with Facebook2026-04-08 14:26
Facebook exec says future Instagram feature will 'nudge' teens away from damaging content2026-04-08 14:23