时间:2026-08-22 10:36:55 来源:网络整理编辑:熱點
Apparently Facebook hoaxes are still alive and well in the year 2016. An old one is making the round
Apparently Facebook hoaxes are still alive and well in the year 2016.
An old one is making the rounds this week, and everyone really needs to stop freaking out. The hoax tells Facebook users to repost a paragraphs-long status to to ensure their privacy.
The two statuses, per CBS News:
As of September 28th , 2015 at 10:50p.m. Eastern standard time, I do not give Facebook or any entities associated with Facebook permission to use my pictures, information, or posts, both past and future. By this statement, I give notice to Facebook it is strictly forbidden to disclose, copy, distribute, or take any other action against me based on this profile and/or its contents. The content of this profile is private and confidential information. The violation of privacy can be punished by law (UCC 1-308- 1 1 308-103 and the Rome Statute).
NOTE: Facebook is now a public entity. All members must post a note like this. If you prefer, you can copy and paste this version. If you do not publish a statement at least once it will be tactically allowing the use of your photos, as well as the information contained in the profile status updates.
And:
Now it's official! It has been published in the media. Facebook has just released the entry price: £5.99 ($9.10) to keep the subscription of your status to be set to "private." If you paste this message on your page, it will be offered free (I said paste not share) if not tomorrow, all your posts can become public. Even the messages that have been deleted or the photos not allowed. After all, it does not cost anything for a simple copy and paste.
In case you still had questions, no, reposting either of these statuses will not protect you from any Facebook encroachment on your privacy.
According to Snopes, the hoaxes go back to at least 2012. The claim behind the statuses isn't true, Snopessaid, since Facebook does not claim copyright to personal information and has not indicated any plans to make private accounts public.
In any case, posting a status would not counteract the legal agreement every Facebook user must check before signing up for an account.
This time around, people are noticing the statuses and posting to warn others of the hoaxes more quickly than in years past. (Not that that's particularly useful either.)
Maybe endorse a candidate for president instead.
TopicsCybersecurityFacebookPrivacy
Chinese gymnastics team horrifies crowd with human jump rope2026-08-22 10:34
This plate will absorb excess calories from your meals2026-08-22 10:33
'Game of Thrones' star Rose Leslie surprises with response to Jon Snow question2026-08-22 10:23
France is deploying anti2026-08-22 10:10
17 questions you can answer if you're a good communicator2026-08-22 10:00
Ancient mega tsunamis on Mars are newest clues to past life2026-08-22 09:27
Can you spot the rude word hiding in this 'Countdown' anagram?2026-08-22 09:02
Tougher, more rugged 'Galaxy S7 Active' is likely an AT&T exclusive2026-08-22 08:56
Singapore rolls out video2026-08-22 08:43
NASA satellites find trigger for magnetic explosions near Earth for first time2026-08-22 08:09
Make money or go to Stanford? Katie Ledecky is left with an unfair choice.2026-08-22 10:20
A giant space shuttle fuel tank drove through LA so everyone took a selfie2026-08-22 10:04
Half of your friends may not actually consider you to be their friend2026-08-22 09:53
Queen wins Tesco gift card, looks happier than we've seen her in years2026-08-22 09:28
Man stumbles upon his phone background in real life2026-08-22 09:22
Nissan unveils a home battery to take on Tesla's Powerwall2026-08-22 09:22
France is deploying anti2026-08-22 08:36
Chrome is making it easier to pay for stuff with your phone2026-08-22 08:20
Major earthquake and multiple aftershocks rock central Italy2026-08-22 08:14
'Games for girls' shelf nails the ridiculousness of gender stereotypes2026-08-22 08:04