时间:2026-02-22 13:47:39 来源:网络整理编辑:熱點
Apparently Facebook hoaxes are still alive and well in the year 2016. An old one is making the round
Apparently Facebook hoaxes are still alive and well in the year 2016.
An old one is making the rounds this week, and everyone really needs to stop freaking out. The hoax tells Facebook users to repost a paragraphs-long status to to ensure their privacy.
The two statuses, per CBS News:
As of September 28th , 2015 at 10:50p.m. Eastern standard time, I do not give Facebook or any entities associated with Facebook permission to use my pictures, information, or posts, both past and future. By this statement, I give notice to Facebook it is strictly forbidden to disclose, copy, distribute, or take any other action against me based on this profile and/or its contents. The content of this profile is private and confidential information. The violation of privacy can be punished by law (UCC 1-308- 1 1 308-103 and the Rome Statute).
NOTE: Facebook is now a public entity. All members must post a note like this. If you prefer, you can copy and paste this version. If you do not publish a statement at least once it will be tactically allowing the use of your photos, as well as the information contained in the profile status updates.
And:
Now it's official! It has been published in the media. Facebook has just released the entry price: £5.99 ($9.10) to keep the subscription of your status to be set to "private." If you paste this message on your page, it will be offered free (I said paste not share) if not tomorrow, all your posts can become public. Even the messages that have been deleted or the photos not allowed. After all, it does not cost anything for a simple copy and paste.
In case you still had questions, no, reposting either of these statuses will not protect you from any Facebook encroachment on your privacy.
According to Snopes, the hoaxes go back to at least 2012. The claim behind the statuses isn't true, Snopessaid, since Facebook does not claim copyright to personal information and has not indicated any plans to make private accounts public.
In any case, posting a status would not counteract the legal agreement every Facebook user must check before signing up for an account.
This time around, people are noticing the statuses and posting to warn others of the hoaxes more quickly than in years past. (Not that that's particularly useful either.)
Maybe endorse a candidate for president instead.
TopicsCybersecurityFacebookPrivacy
Katy Perry talks 'Rise,' her next batch of songs, and how to survive Twitter2026-02-22 13:46
"The Witcher" Season 2 review: Geralt is back and he's dad now2026-02-22 13:41
Tamagotchi turns 25 with a nostalgia2026-02-22 12:34
How to convert YouTube videos to MP3 files2026-02-22 12:22
Richard Branson 'thought he was going to die' in bike accident2026-02-22 12:16
Conservatives dug up an old tweet from new Twitter CEO that quotes 'The Daily Show'2026-02-22 12:16
There's a life2026-02-22 12:05
The "we used to be a proper country" meme went viral on Twitter this week2026-02-22 12:02
Chinese gymnastics team horrifies crowd with human jump rope2026-02-22 11:53
There's a life2026-02-22 11:32
This app is giving streaming TV news a second try2026-02-22 13:45
Tamagotchi turns 25 with a nostalgia2026-02-22 13:42
Guillermo del Toro's 'Nightmare Alley' is derailed by Bradley Cooper2026-02-22 13:40
Meta's VRChat clone, Horizon Worlds, launches for all adult users on Quest 22026-02-22 13:21
'The Flying Bum' aircraft crashes during second test flight2026-02-22 12:59
Roasting Thanksgiving plates is a Twitter tradition and people are starting to catch on2026-02-22 12:41
'The Dawn of Everything' is a history book for the 99 percent ... of history2026-02-22 12:25
Reddit's new update makes upvotes more dynamic2026-02-22 11:42
This coloring book is here for all your relationship goals2026-02-22 11:06
There's a life2026-02-22 11:04