时间:2025-12-09 02:47:19 来源:网络整理编辑:休閑
Worried about a dystopian future in which AI rule the world and humans are enslaved to autonomous te
Worried about a dystopian future in which AI rule the world and humans are enslaved to autonomous technology? You're not alone. So are billionaires (kind of).
First it was the Partnership on AI formed by Google, Amazon, Microsoft, Facebook and IBM.
Then came Elon Musk and Peter Thiel's recent investment in $1 billion research body, OpenAI.
Now, a new batch of tech founders are throwing money at ethical artificial intelligence (AI) and autonomous systems (AS). And experts say it couldn't come sooner.
SEE ALSO:Doctors take inspiration from online dating to build organ transplant AILinkedIn founder, Reid Hoffman, and eBay founder, Pierre Omidyar (through his philanthropic investment fund) donated a combined $20 million to the Ethics and Governance of Artificial Intelligence Fund on Jan. 11 -- helping ensure the future's more "man and machine, not man versus machine," as IBM CEO Ginny Rometty put it to WSJ Thursday.
But how will they put their praxis where their prose is, and what's at stake if they don’t?
"There's an urgency to ensure that AI benefits society and minimises harm," said Hoffman in a statement distributed via fellow fund contributors, The Knight Foundation. "AI decision-making can influence many aspects of our world -- education, transportation, healthcare, criminal justice and the economy -- yet data and code behind those decisions can be largely invisible."
That's a sentiment echoed by Raja Chatila, executive committee chair for the IEEE Global Initiative for Ethical Considerations in Artificial Intelligence and Autonomous Systems. The IEEE Standards Association aims educate and empower technologists in the prioritisation of ethical considerations that, in their opinion, will make or break our relationship with AI and AS.
The organisation's Ethically Aligned Design study, published in Dec., is step one in what they hope will be the beginning of a smarter working relationship between humans and systems.
"You either prioritise well-being or you don't -- it's a binary choice," said Chatila.
Like Hoffman, Chatila feels a palpable sense of urgency when it comes to work of these research bodies. For him, our sense of democracy could be sacrificed if we begin fearing algorithms or data usage that we don't fully understand, could distort our voice.
"The United Nations has chosen to prioritise the analysis and adoption of autonomous weapons in 2017. This is because beyond typical military issues, these discussions will very likely set precedents for every vertical in AI," he told Mashable.
"Beyond the issue of weapons, what's also really at stake is human agency as we know it today. When individuals have no control over how their data is used, especially in the virtual and augmented reality environment to come, we risk having outlets to express our subjective truth." The algorithmic nightmare that was Facebook's "fake news" comes to mind.
Meanwhile the Ethics and Governance of Artificial Intelligence Fund says it will aim to support a "cross-section of AI ethics and governance projects and activities," globally and other members mentioned to date include Raptor Group founder Jim Pallotta and William and Flora Hewlett Foundation, who've committed another $1 million each.
Activities the fund will support, according to the statement, include a joint AI fellowship for people helping keep human interests at the forefront of their work, cross-institutional convening, research funding and promoting topics like ethical design, accountability, innovation and communicating about AI and AS more broadly.
While stewardship of ethical research in AI seems more urgent than ever, there's no concrete cause for concern when it comes to innovation in the field. According to Chatila, current or future unintended ethical consequences aren't the result of AI designers or companies being "evil" or uncaring.
"It's just that you can't build something that's going to directly interact with humans and their emotions, that makes choices surrounding intimate aspects of their lives, and not qualify the actions a machine or system will take beforehand," he said.
"For instance, if you build a phone with no privacy settings that captures people's data, some users won't care if they don't mind sharing their data in a typical fashion.
"But for someone who doesn't want to share their data in this way, they'll buy a phone that honours their choices with settings that do so. This is why a lot of people are saying consumers will 'pay for privacy.'" Which of course, becomes less of an issue if manufacturers are "building for values" from the get-go.
"We need to move beyond fear regarding AI, at least in terms of Terminator-like scenarios. This is where applied ethics, or due diligence around asking tough questions regarding the implementation of specific technologies, will best help end users,” he said.
IEEE is currently working on a Standard along the lines of a "best practice" document called "P7000" that Chatila says will help update the systems development process to include explicitly Ethical factors.
“Having organisations and companies become signatories [to industry standards] would be fantastic, where they reorient their innovation practices to include ethical alignment in this way from the start," he said.
With OpenAI, the IEEE’s Ethically Aligned Design project and now the Ethics and Governance of Artificial Intelligence Fund, there could be every chance companies will move beyond good intentions and into standardised practices that factor human well-being into design.
So long as they hurry the heck up. Innovation waits for nought.
"You either prioritise well-being or you don't -- it's a binary choice," said Chatila. "And if you prioritise exponential growth, for instance, that means you can't focus on a holistic picture that best reflects all of society's needs."
TopicsArtificial IntelligenceLinkedIn
Here's George Takei chilling in zero gravity for the 'Star Trek' anniversary2025-12-09 02:36
【波盈世界杯】 都體 :尤文將與藍軍&熱刺爭格瓦迪奧爾 ,萊比錫要價至少5000萬歐 ( 萊比錫,迪奧 )2025-12-09 02:34
【波盈世界杯】 切爾西鼓勵庫利巴利和門迪:很棒的世界杯之旅 ( 世界杯,塞內加爾 )2025-12-09 02:34
【波盈世界杯】 C羅下家賠率:葡體第一 ,切爾西第2 、拜仁第4 、皇馬第5、巴黎第6 ( 切爾西,巴黎 )2025-12-09 02:27
Two states took big steps this week to get rid of the tampon tax2025-12-09 02:18
【波盈世界杯】 C羅下家賠率:葡體第一 ,切爾西第2、拜仁第4、皇馬第5 、巴黎第6 ( 切爾西,巴黎 )2025-12-09 01:01
【波盈世界杯】 記者 :利物浦皇馬並列領跑貝林厄姆爭奪,多特要價1.3億英鎊 ( 世界杯,利物浦 )2025-12-09 00:43
【波盈世界杯】 【進球統計】阿森納1球 、利物浦1球 、熱刺1球,切爾西2025-12-09 00:37
Singapore gets world's first driverless taxis2025-12-09 00:11
【波盈世界杯】 【深度】瓊阿梅尼揭開利物浦與皇馬的“討論” ( 利物浦,中場 )2025-12-09 00:04
Early Apple2025-12-09 02:15
【波盈世界杯】 巴西VS韓國首發曝光:胖虎領銜 ,內馬爾強勢複出,熱刺神鋒衝鋒 ( 韓國隊,巴西 )2025-12-09 01:45
【波盈世界杯】 隨隊晉級8強 ,曼城官方為福登等5名隊內英格蘭球員送上祝賀 ( 英格蘭,曼城 )2025-12-09 01:40
【波盈足球】 曼聯售價多少合適?格雷澤想要60億鎊 ,福布斯估值為39億鎊 ( 曼聯,福布斯 )2025-12-09 01:09
New Zealand designer's photo series celebrates the elegance of aging2025-12-09 01:07
【波盈世界杯】 1億中鋒拿去互換?利物浦或求購尤文射手 ,努涅斯太讓人失望了 ( 利物浦,烏拉圭 )2025-12-09 00:56
【波盈世界杯】 誰不在誰尷尬 !利物浦為英格蘭貢獻0 曼聯個個有收獲 ( 阿諾德,英格蘭 )2025-12-09 00:35
【波盈世界杯】 TA獨家:瓜迪奧拉同意與曼城續約,雙方新合同將至2025年 ( 足球世界杯,迪奧 )2025-12-09 00:28
Michael Phelps says goodbye to the pool with Olympic gold2025-12-09 00:12
【波盈世界杯】 國米出手了!盧卡庫遭球迷嘲諷,切爾西徹底放棄,意甲豪門續租 ( 比利時,切爾西 )2025-12-09 00:10