时间:2026-08-21 10:14:33 来源:网络整理编辑:百科
We’ve been debating Net Neutrality for more than 20 years. In that time, the internet's gone t
We’ve been debating Net Neutrality for more than 20 years. In that time, the internet's gone through substantial changes, and maybe those old concerns about an open and equal internet might no longer be a concern?
Not even close.
If anything, the concerns of 1996 are of greater importance and urgency today, as media-conglomerates like Comcast and Verizon take control of both the pipelines for internet access and content with alarming regularity. Then there's the last champion of Net Neutrality, the Federal Communications Commission, with their new chairman: Ajit Pa, who's made it crystal clear that he's got no love for the FCC Net Neutrality Rules enacted in 2015.
SEE ALSO:Under Trump, dark days ahead for net neutrality and the open internetWhether or not it's true, it’s time to face facts: Net Neutrality's as good as dead.

Not to be doomsayers, but it's time to buckle up: There's a load of impacts, many of them not good, that can happen the moment ISP’s can choose which content they want on their networks, what speeds they want to serve it at, and how much they want to charge you for content they own versus content other people own.
Here's a look at what life is like when Net Neutrality's no longer the law of the land:
Broadband's filling up with companies that own both the pipes and the content that flows through them. Think back to the early days of cinema, when movie studios owned the theaters their movies played. It was an unhealthy alliance that shut out smaller studios who didn’t own theaters from distributing other films, and competing with, for instance, Paramount Studios on a level playing field. The U.S. government stepped in in 1948 and broke up this monopoly.
But a new monopoly's being created now. When ISPs and wireless service providers also own broadcast networks (Comcast and NBC/Universal) or even Google Fiber and YouTube, it can lead to them favoring access to their content over other independent shows and movies.
This is why people are freaking out about "zero rating." If you don’t have to eat up mobile data to stream this week’s episode of NBC-Comcast's This Is Usbecause you’re also a Comcast customer, you may wonder why you don’t get the same benefit streaming the CBS sitcom Kevin Can Wait. CBS is put at an unfair disadvantage here, because you're now incentivized to watch only NBC shows, thereby starving the competition of viewers and, potentially, ad dollars.
With that in mind, think of a company like Netflix, which, by some measures, accounts for more than a third of the internet’s bandwidth usage, could find that fewer people are tuning into the next season of Stranger Things because it’s costlier. And so on.
So what's Netflix do when they start losing subscribers, because their content is more expensive to watch? They charge their shrinking subscriber base more money, of course.
Netflix, Hulu, and Amazon Prime Video might also find that service producers want to start charging them more for their excessive bandwidth needs. That cost will be passed along to consumers, as well. In the meantime, the ISPs and wireless providers that have content partners may give all of them a free pass, creating a massive content highway imbalance.
Those smaller content platforms like Crackle? Hope you enjoyed them while they lasted. They're gonna be hard-pressed to pay ISP carrier fees, and their choices will be to sell out to conglomerates, or fold up altogether.
Amazon's the world’s most popular online shopping site. The New York Timesis the preeminent news source. Netflix is your go-to-binge site. And so on. One day, long after Net Neutrality's dead and buried, you go online through your phone or desktop, and every time you type in “Amazon,” the web browser opens the Home Shopping Network (HSN). As a Charter Communications customer, you’re confused, until you realize that Liberty Media owns a minority stake in Charter, and owns 100% of the Home Shopping Network. HSN isn't Amazon, but surely, it’ll work for you.
Extreme? Maybe, but there will soon be nothing stopping ISPs from building Amazon, NYT and Netflix knockoffs whose service they legally can prioritize over the other websites.
If a media conglomerate decided to stream a major sports event to all its customers, it may prioritize that bandwidth over other streaming content. Don’t like the Super Bowl? Fine, enjoy some 2G-speed Netflix, or some stuttering multi-player video-gaming. Have fun with that.
No one in this world's truly neutral. So why wouldn’t we expect ISPs to have a point of view? Without the FCC and Net Neutrality rules to stop them, ISPs could offer better access to some websites over others—maybe right-leaning or left-leaning sites over one another. Maybe it pulls all the content it doeswant you to see onto an accessible proxy server, while leaving everything else lost in the open internet wilderness.
Proponents of ending Net Neutrality will tout de-regulation and greater competition, which could—theoretically—lead to greater innovation and lower prices for online access. That may be somewhat true for mobile broadband providers, where there's decent competition, and plenty of programs tailored to foster our mobile binge-watching habits, regardless of who provides that content. But fixed broadband offers regional consumers few (if any) competitive choices.
In addition, ISPs and carriers clearly aren’t satisfied with serving bits and bytes to consumers. They want access to the more lucrative and dynamic creative side, as well. In the space of two years, Verizon's acquired AOL and Yahoo. Both companies deliver content that could compete with websites, media companies and cable networks that remain unaffiliated with broadband companies.
And broadband and wireless service providers will continue buying content companies, while media orphans increasingly struggle to find open, agnostic ways to access audience. They'll be stuck in neutral.
And this will be our new net reality. Get ready for what's to come.
TopicsNet Neutrality
You can now play 'Solitaire' and 'Tic2026-08-21 09:53
國安3老參加北京西城區社區杯賽事 曾攜手參加世界杯2026-08-21 09:39
比利時前瞻:盧卡庫爭四連殺 紅魔衝主場27場不敗2026-08-21 09:38
一掃陰霾 !C羅門前端射終結三場球荒 刷爆N多紀錄2026-08-21 08:44
Chinese gymnastics team horrifies crowd with human jump rope2026-08-21 08:30
賣隊長?德甲勁旅王牌遭哄搶 熱刺領先利物浦曼聯2026-08-21 08:23
三級職業聯賽敲定揭幕時間地點 中超將有選擇開放售票場次2026-08-21 08:17
津媒:裏皮時代國足陣型效果並不好 國腳適應複雜戰術有難度2026-08-21 07:53
Daughter gives her 1002026-08-21 07:52
中超開賽"倒逼"準入名單公布 足協或再經曆新一輪聲討2026-08-21 07:38
Nate Parker is finally thinking about the woman who accused him of rape2026-08-21 10:10
歐洲杯國腳觀察 :C羅絕殺球被吹 萊萬盧卡庫爆火2026-08-21 09:57
媒體:津門虎或進行混合所有製改革 要好好活的不止天津足球2026-08-21 09:41
天津食品集團旗下某企業成津門虎新讚助商 讚助金額3千萬2026-08-21 09:26
Nancy Pelosi warns colleagues after info hacked2026-08-21 09:11
王長慶 :國安保名眾望所歸 呂鵬:離開國安心情複雜2026-08-21 09:08
深足官方慰問薑至鵬及其家人 表揚球員家國情懷2026-08-21 08:47
曼城官方宣布阿圭羅今夏離隊 視哈蘭德為第一替身2026-08-21 08:14
The five guys who climbed Australia's highest mountain, in swimwear2026-08-21 07:53
CIES評2021球員榜:梅西力壓萊萬 若鳥第3勝C羅2026-08-21 07:37