时间:2026-07-07 09:47:42 来源:网络整理编辑:探索
At the risk of stating the obvious, leading is hard. “Dealing with people,” wrote Dale C
At the risk of stating the obvious, leading is hard.
“Dealing with people,” wrote Dale Carnegie over 80 years ago, “is probably the biggest problem you face.” Bleak as it may sound, the challenge of leading is just that: People.
If anything, it’s gotten tougher. The once reigning champ of leading people at work — wage increases — now displays a “very weak” link to motivation, satisfaction, and performance. Even more pointed, a 2016 study from Fidelity found that 58 percent of millennials prefer “improved quality of work life” over financial benefits.
So, what does work? In short: people want to be treated like people especiallyat work.

Thankfully, leading like a human comes down to three habits you can start practicing today.
When Stanford business professors James Baron and Michael Hannan concluded their expansive eight-year study of over 200 tech startups, one finding emerged. Their goal was to determine the most successful managerial style. To do that, the duo created five models: engineering, star, commitment, bureaucracy, and autocracy.
Despite mainstream wisdom, Baron and Hannan discovered that the “commitment” model — which relied on “emotional or familial ties of employees to the organization, selection based on cultural fit, and peer-group control” — outperformed its counterparts on all fronts. In fact, not a single of the commitment organizations they studied failed.
Leaders can build commitment through a host of methods, but the most uncomplicated answer lies in one we often overlook — encouragement.
In Baron and Hannan’s study, encouragement lay at the heart of each commitment organization. Likewise, Duke behavioral economists Dan Ariely validated this finding through a series of experiments at Intel. Compliments — nothing more than a simple “Well done!” from the boss — increased productivity 34.7 percent more than monetary bonuses over a one week period.
Why?
Because while cash led to initial boosts in motivation, feelings of entitlement immediately followed. Compliments, on the other hand, sustained. Gratitude is arguably the single most beneficial human emotion. That’s true day to day as well as when your people make career decision with long-term consequences.
The thing is, compliments and commitment don’t happen by accident. They take intentionality: a deliberate focus to look for what’s right and call it out. “Praise and gratitude,” says Katie Melissa, CEO at Starbound Marketing, “are always more effective than criticism. People inherently want to feel appreciated and important.”
This is all the more vital when the people you lead struggle and stumble. As Jeremy Miller puts it, “A word of encouragement during a failure is worth more than an hour of praise after a success.”
The second avenue to humane leadership is a favorite among forward thinkers. Unfortunately, it’s also the most counterintuitive. Daniel Pink — in both his TEDTalk and book-length treatment — lays out the comprehensive benefits of autonomy:
“According to a cluster of recent behavioral science studies, autonomous motivation promotes greater conceptual understanding, enhanced persistence, higher productivity, less burnout, and greater levels of psychological well-being.”
Autonomy means freedom, and freedom stems from the little word “less.”
Starting out in a career or new environment, structure fuels performance. But as time progresses, what top performing team members look for is autonomy and trust. “If you want to run an immature team,” explains brand strategist Leonard Kim, “keep a tight structure. But if you want to attract the best of the best to follow you, then loosen your grip.”
In other words, leading more demands leading less… or at least leading less hands on.
Micro-management breeds resentment, which why the most practical place to start is with less meetings. Estimates on how much time meetings wastes range from 25 to 50 percent of our total working hours. Too often, those meetings are little more than veiled attempts for leaders to flex.
Whether small, large, or even one-on-one gatherings, this desire to exert control stems from the fear that the people we lead are going to make mistakes. But as Ed Catmull, founder and CEO of Pixar, points out:
“Failure is a manifestation of learning and exploration. If you aren’t experiencing failure, then you are making a far worse mistake: You are being driven by the desire to avoid it. And, for leaders especially, this strategy … dooms you to fail.”
The other alternative is to transform necessary meetings into genuine human gatherings. In the delightfully titled Meet Is Murder, Virginia Hefferman outlines “Holacratic” meetings, which leaders like Tony Hsieh, C.E.O. of Zappos, and Evan Williams, co-founder of Twitter and Medium.com, have embraced:
"Each Circle holds a weekly or biweekly 'tactical meeting' for progress updates and a biweekly or monthly ‘governance meeting.’ A governance meeting starts with a Check-In, or rather (according to Holacracy literature) ‘a space for every participant to call out any distraction and get present for the meeting.'"
Intentionally limiting oversight can sound scary. But that’s why easing into it with less meetings or your own adaptation of the Holacratic system works so well.
Our final method comes from the unlikely worlds of car manufacturing and software development. “The agile methodology,” as Charles Duhigg explains in Smarter Faster Better, “emphasized collaboration, frequent testing, rapid iteration, and pushing decision making to whoever was closest to a problem.”
Essentially, agile leadership blends commitment — namely, collaboration and relational ties — with autonomy — flexibility and decentralized decision-making. Agile leaders entrust responsibility to their teams knowing that humans naturally reciprocate that trust with passionate, long-term commitment.
At the big-picture level, the applications of agile are everywhere (though rarely under that title). Words like self-management, trust, transparency, and personal responsibility appear over and over again in the annual lists of “best companies to work for.”
The quickest way to go agile, however, comes from the last phrase of Duhigg’s definition: “pushing decision making to whoever was closest to a problem.” This can be as small as budgetary discretion or it can be momentous: giving each person full control over halting production (a story Duhigg chronicles).
The rise of remote working makes agility even more crucial. According to Polycom’s recent study of 25,234 workers — The Changing World of Work: A Global Survey — “nearly two thirds of the global workforce take advantage of anywhere working.” That’s a 343 percent increase from 2012: 14 percent compared to 62. The more dispersed your people, the more hierarchical structures become productivity killing bottlenecks.
Agile, in contrast, prioritizes tight cycles of feedback not with internal leadership, but with external users and customers. By giving teams direct access to real-world testing, whether they’re building an app or selling an stove, human-centered leaders empowered the people “closest to the problem” to act.
After all, in the words of Clinton Senkow, Co-Founder and COO at Influencive: “If you don't trust your employees to work from anywhere and solve problems on their own, you probably shouldn't have hired them in the first place.”
It’s true: leadership is hard. The temptation to rule with gold or gun is hard to resist.
But old-school methods no longer work. What does?
Going back to Carnegie, “There is only one way under high heaven to get anybody to do anything. And that is by making the other person want to do it.”
As it turns out, the key word in that sentence is the same one that gives us so much grief: “person.” What the people in our lives want is to be treated like people: encouraged, free, and agile. That’s how you lead.
Aaron Orendorff is the founder of
There's a big piece of fake chicken stuck to this phone case2026-07-07 09:29
卡塔爾世界杯半決賽克羅地亞對陣阿根廷,哪支隊伍能闖入決賽 ?(西班牙和克羅地亞誰強)2026-07-07 09:22
新賽季法甲首秀!梅西1戰衝5大紀錄 800球裏程碑在望(梅西個人進球數)2026-07-07 09:20
梅西進球數破馬拉多納記錄 ,2026世界杯三個東道主全軍覆沒(球王馬拉多納和梅西誰強)2026-07-07 08:57
Katy Perry talks 'Rise,' her next batch of songs, and how to survive Twitter2026-07-07 08:44
四年前輸給克羅地亞0:3,阿根廷主帥表示這次半決賽球隊更強大了(克羅地亞和阿根廷誰厲害一些)2026-07-07 08:03
東方神曲《早安隆回》燃爆卡塔爾世界杯(卡塔爾世界杯歌曲女主唱)2026-07-07 07:52
克羅地亞阿根廷晉級四強(世界杯克羅地亞和阿根廷誰厲害)2026-07-07 07:36
Olympian celebrates by ordering an intimidating amount of McDonald's2026-07-07 07:17
2022世界杯八強預測分析 ,根據近期戰績預測:日本晉級,韓國出局(2022世界杯法國成績如何)2026-07-07 07:16
You can now play 'Solitaire' and 'Tic2026-07-07 09:26
2018年世界杯克羅地亞3比0完勝阿根廷,今晚半決賽還能創造奇跡麽(克羅地亞淘汰阿根廷了嗎)2026-07-07 09:22
梅西傳射助阿根廷晉級八強,範帥昏招致荷蘭點球出局(梅西傳射阿根廷進決賽了嗎)2026-07-07 08:55
克羅地亞是如何以3:0戰勝阿根廷的 ?(世界杯英格蘭和克羅地亞哪個厲害)2026-07-07 08:48
Visualizing July's astounding global temperature records2026-07-07 08:34
國足12強賽結果全預測 ,吸取上屆教訓,打進2022年世界杯有戲(2022世界杯戰績表格圖)2026-07-07 08:31
Z世代2022世界杯觀賽及消費行為呈現五大特征(2022世界杯成績)2026-07-07 08:01
環時深度2022卡塔爾世界杯 ,看熱門也看黑馬(世界杯2022賽程及結果表最新)2026-07-07 07:27
Ivanka Trump's unpaid interns share cringeworthy financial advice2026-07-07 07:08
2022卡塔爾世界杯冠軍預測分析 世界杯奪冠熱門國家球隊介紹(2022世界杯比賽積分)2026-07-07 07:06