时间:2025-10-08 00:02:34 来源:网络整理编辑:探索
The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) might be stepping up the country's AI enforcement mechan
The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) might be stepping up the country's AI enforcement mechanisms, as the organization explores new rules for disclosing the use of AI in political ads.
According to a new Notice of Proposed Rulemaking released this week, the commission is beginning initial investigations into nationwide requirements for labeling AI used in political advertising on TV and radio. The FCC will explore mandates for live, on-air and written AI disclosures and, most divisively, will work to define the scope of "AI-generated content."
Proposed rules could apply to cable operators, satellite TV providers, and radio providers, but would not affect internet streaming services.
"The use of AI is expected to play a substantial role in the creation of political ads in 2024 and beyond, but the use of AI-generated content in political ads also creates a potential for providing deceptive information to voters, in particular, the potential use of 'deep fakes' – altered images, videos, or audio recordings that depict people doing or saying things that did not actually do or say, or events that did not actually occur," the FCC writes. The rules would leverage powers provided to the FCC via the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act.
FCC chairwoman Jessica Rosenworcel called on fellow regulators to explore AI safety in the proposal's news release, writing, "As artificial intelligence tools become more accessible, the Commission wants to make sure consumers are fully informed when the technology is used. Today, I’ve shared with my colleagues a proposal that makes clear consumers have a right to know when AI tools are being used in the political ads they see, and I hope they swiftly act on this issue.”
Notably, the FCC's proposal isn't exploring an outright ban of AI-altered content in political advertising, despite growing concern, and the proposed rule making process will not result in a finalized set of requirements for at least several months.
Until then, the onus for AI labeling sits with individual companies and AI developers themselves.
TopicsArtificial IntelligenceFCCSocial GoodPolitics
Richard Branson 'thought he was going to die' in bike accident2025-10-07 23:35
Someone literally broke the internet2025-10-07 23:34
What is Clubhouse? Good luck getting invited to the social app.2025-10-07 22:50
Tesla's in2025-10-07 22:47
MashReads Podcast: What makes a good summer read?2025-10-07 22:26
Xbox and Bethesda dropped a *ton* of trailers at their E3 kickoff2025-10-07 22:19
Rimac Nevera is an electric hypercar that goes from 02025-10-07 22:01
El Salvador wants to be the first nation to treat bitcoin like cash2025-10-07 21:47
This German startup wants to be your bank (without being a bank)2025-10-07 21:33
How to delete your Gmail account2025-10-07 21:27
U.S. pole vaulter skids to a halt for national anthem2025-10-07 23:54
Venmo's $100,000 giveaway is deeply annoying2025-10-07 23:34
Facebook's smartwatch could sidestep Apple and Google's privacy push2025-10-07 22:17
The Purge has never been subtle, but the mask is fully off in 'The Forever Purge'2025-10-07 22:12
This weird squid looks like it has googly eyes, guys2025-10-07 22:08
How to watch Apple's WWDC 20212025-10-07 22:06
How to use Alexa as a speaker2025-10-07 21:42
Next year's iPad Pro might support wireless charging2025-10-07 21:26
Olympian celebrates by ordering an intimidating amount of McDonald's2025-10-07 21:23
Two galaxies collide in chaotic Hubble image2025-10-07 21:19