时间:2025-11-22 11:18:06 来源:网络整理编辑:綜合
Evernote has decided to "revisit" its controversial privacy policy following a swift backlash from i
Evernote has decided to "revisit" its controversial privacy policy following a swift backlash from its users. 。
In a statement on the company's blog, Evernote said it would no longer be implementing the privacy policy it had previously announced and that its machine learning updates, which necessitated some employees read portions of user notes, would be solely opt-in.。
SEE ALSO:Evernote won't let you opt out of employees reading parts of your notes。The update comes one day after Evernote CEO Chris O'Neill said the company "communicated poorly" about the proposed changes but didn't back away from the changes, which he said would improve the company's note taking software. 。
"We will be revising our existing Privacy Policy to address our customers’ concerns, reinforce that their data remains private by default, and confirm the trust they have placed in Evernote is well founded," the company said in an update posted by Evernote's senior director of communications, Greg Chiemingo. 。

"In addition, we will make machine learning technologies available to our users, but no employees will be reading note content as part of this process unless users opt in." 。
Thanks for signing up!。
In an effort to improve its machine learning technology, Evernote had said that some employees would be able to view portions of users' notes for quality control. O'Neill later clarified that personally identifying information would be hidden, but the explanation did little to reassure the privacy conscious.。
While the latest update will no doubt come as welcome news, it raises the question of whether it is too little too late. As others have pointed out, Evernote can still gain access to users' notes in certain circumstances, like complying with a warrant from a law enforcement agency. 。
And while a promise to "revisit" its policies is a step in the right direction, without thoroughly explaining the alternatives, it's difficult to assess whether this is a short term fix to a publicity problem or the beginner of a longer term commitment to protecting user privacy.。
By making its original changes opt-out only, so that users would automatically be enrolled into the new features unless they changed their account settings, the company sent a message -- intended or not -- that its technology was more important than its users privacy. That's not something that can be easily undone with an apologetic blog post.。
Richard Branson 'thought he was going to die' in bike accident2025-11-22 11:06
'Fantastic Beasts': Let's talk about that Grindelwald reveal2025-11-22 11:03
7 smoky beers to challenge your taste buds2025-11-22 10:54
Even faster charging tech will juice phones from 0 to 50% in 15 minutes2025-11-22 10:52
Cat gets stuck in the most awkward position ever2025-11-22 10:31
Bernie Sanders demands Trump kick 'racist' Bannon to the curb2025-11-22 10:07
People are boycotting companies that endorse Donald Trump2025-11-22 09:20
Photoshop battle predicts Trump's White House decor2025-11-22 09:11
Olympics official on Rio's green diving pool: 'Chemistry is not an exact science'2025-11-22 08:53
NASA discovers mysterious electron superhighway above Earth2025-11-22 08:37
These glasses hide a fitness tracker on your face2025-11-22 10:50
Next Spectacles vending machine location will be revealed Sunday2025-11-22 10:38
'Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them': Movie Review2025-11-22 10:30
'Pokémon Go' says 'thank you' to fans, but not for Thanksgiving2025-11-22 10:07
This 'sh*tpost' bot makes terrible memes so you don't have to2025-11-22 09:41
'Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them': Movie Review2025-11-22 09:36
People are boycotting companies that endorse Donald Trump2025-11-22 09:09
NASA discovers mysterious electron superhighway above Earth2025-11-22 08:53
Is Samsung's Galaxy Note7 really the best phone?2025-11-22 08:49
Even faster charging tech will juice phones from 0 to 50% in 15 minutes2025-11-22 08:36