时间:2025-11-22 10:39:08 来源:网络整理编辑:休閑
Evernote has decided to "revisit" its controversial privacy policy following a swift backlash from i
Evernote has decided to "revisit" its controversial privacy policy following a swift backlash from its users.。
In a statement on the company's blog, Evernote said it would no longer be implementing the privacy policy it had previously announced and that its machine learning updates, which necessitated some employees read portions of user notes, would be solely opt-in.。
SEE ALSO:Evernote won't let you opt out of employees reading parts of your notes 。The update comes one day after Evernote CEO Chris O'Neill said the company "communicated poorly" about the proposed changes but didn't back away from the changes, which he said would improve the company's note taking software.。
"We will be revising our existing Privacy Policy to address our customers’ concerns, reinforce that their data remains private by default, and confirm the trust they have placed in Evernote is well founded," the company said in an update posted by Evernote's senior director of communications, Greg Chiemingo. 。

"In addition, we will make machine learning technologies available to our users, but no employees will be reading note content as part of this process unless users opt in." 。
Thanks for signing up! 。
In an effort to improve its machine learning technology, Evernote had said that some employees would be able to view portions of users' notes for quality control. O'Neill later clarified that personally identifying information would be hidden, but the explanation did little to reassure the privacy conscious.。
While the latest update will no doubt come as welcome news, it raises the question of whether it is too little too late. As others have pointed out, Evernote can still gain access to users' notes in certain circumstances, like complying with a warrant from a law enforcement agency. 。
And while a promise to "revisit" its policies is a step in the right direction, without thoroughly explaining the alternatives, it's difficult to assess whether this is a short term fix to a publicity problem or the beginner of a longer term commitment to protecting user privacy. 。
By making its original changes opt-out only, so that users would automatically be enrolled into the new features unless they changed their account settings, the company sent a message -- intended or not -- that its technology was more important than its users privacy. That's not something that can be easily undone with an apologetic blog post.。
Give your kitchen sponge a rest on this adorable bed2025-11-22 10:27
New partnerships will let you tell your Sonos speakers what music to play2025-11-22 10:07
How one Aussie company became huge in China2025-11-22 10:07
360 video captures Big Boi partying at a music festival just like everyone else2025-11-22 09:56
Whyd voice2025-11-22 09:21
Bow down to the politician who's the Queen of verbal smackdowns2025-11-22 09:08
Patient owl rescued from pesky barbed wire fence2025-11-22 08:47
Get on board: Australia has just launched its first driverless bus2025-11-22 08:45
Early Apple2025-11-22 08:11
MTV VMAs 2016: See the full winners list2025-11-22 07:58
Hiddleswift finally followed each other on Instagram after 3 excruciating days2025-11-22 10:28
Tesla drivers who abuse Autopilot could lose Autosteer function2025-11-22 10:06
A deep dive into Apple's 'sweetheart deal' with Ireland2025-11-22 09:55
An astronaut just broke Scott Kelly's record, and Scott's not even mad about it2025-11-22 09:47
Chinese gymnastics team horrifies crowd with human jump rope2025-11-22 09:44
Joseph Schooling marks Olympic gold with new tattoo2025-11-22 09:40
Student sprawled out in library ends up in Photoshop battle2025-11-22 09:04
'Bachelor' tried to make chocolate baths sexy and it was disgusting2025-11-22 08:54
Donald Trump's tangled web of Russian influence2025-11-22 08:52
Hangry little hedgehog will only cheer up if you give him treats2025-11-22 08:42