时间:2026-08-21 10:26:06 来源:网络整理编辑:休閑
Evernote has decided to "revisit" its controversial privacy policy following a swift backlash from i
Evernote has decided to "revisit" its controversial privacy policy following a swift backlash from its users.。
In a statement on the company's blog, Evernote said it would no longer be implementing the privacy policy it had previously announced and that its machine learning updates, which necessitated some employees read portions of user notes, would be solely opt-in.。
SEE ALSO:Evernote won't let you opt out of employees reading parts of your notes。The update comes one day after Evernote CEO Chris O'Neill said the company "communicated poorly" about the proposed changes but didn't back away from the changes, which he said would improve the company's note taking software.。
"We will be revising our existing Privacy Policy to address our customers’ concerns, reinforce that their data remains private by default, and confirm the trust they have placed in Evernote is well founded," the company said in an update posted by Evernote's senior director of communications, Greg Chiemingo.。

"In addition, we will make machine learning technologies available to our users, but no employees will be reading note content as part of this process unless users opt in." 。
Thanks for signing up! 。
In an effort to improve its machine learning technology, Evernote had said that some employees would be able to view portions of users' notes for quality control. O'Neill later clarified that personally identifying information would be hidden, but the explanation did little to reassure the privacy conscious.。
While the latest update will no doubt come as welcome news, it raises the question of whether it is too little too late. As others have pointed out, Evernote can still gain access to users' notes in certain circumstances, like complying with a warrant from a law enforcement agency. 。
And while a promise to "revisit" its policies is a step in the right direction, without thoroughly explaining the alternatives, it's difficult to assess whether this is a short term fix to a publicity problem or the beginner of a longer term commitment to protecting user privacy. 。
By making its original changes opt-out only, so that users would automatically be enrolled into the new features unless they changed their account settings, the company sent a message -- intended or not -- that its technology was more important than its users privacy. That's not something that can be easily undone with an apologetic blog post.。
Singapore gets world's first driverless taxis2026-08-21 10:24
Super Typhoon Nepartak is an example of terrifying meteorological perfection2026-08-21 10:17
Learn how to negotiate your salary in our next #BizChats2026-08-21 09:27
Mr. Potato Head received an interesting makeover for charity2026-08-21 09:09
Olympics official on Rio's green diving pool: 'Chemistry is not an exact science'2026-08-21 09:07
Crackle announces premiere date for Adam Brody, Martin Freeman drama 'StartUp'2026-08-21 09:07
Chelsea Handler talks frankly about her 2 abortions in Playboy essay2026-08-21 08:45
Taiwanese dog models fruit couture like a pro2026-08-21 08:35
Singapore gets world's first driverless taxis2026-08-21 07:59
PSA: Be careful where you spit your sunflower seed shells2026-08-21 07:58
Early Apple2026-08-21 09:56
The NFL is hiring a Snapchat editor to build a new Discover channel2026-08-21 09:36
Photo of police in riot gear arresting protester in a dress strikes chord on social media2026-08-21 09:34
This adorable 62026-08-21 09:25
Despite IOC ban, Rio crowds get their political messages across2026-08-21 09:06
Photo of police in riot gear arresting protester in a dress strikes chord on social media2026-08-21 08:35
Barcelona Wax Museum thinks E.T. was in ‘Star Wars'2026-08-21 08:32
#CarefreeBlackKids2k16 offers comfort in the midst of tragedy2026-08-21 08:05
What brands need to know about virtual reality2026-08-21 07:55
Google Calendar experienced a widespread outage2026-08-21 07:49