时间:2026-08-21 12:49:47 来源:网络整理编辑:百科
Nothing epitomizes our love-hate relationship with today's tech more than the push notification. Our
Nothing epitomizes our love-hate relationship with today's tech more than the push notification.
Our hatred of those badges, banners, and little red dots has never felt more visceral. To anyone with a smartphone, the device often feels like a devil's bargain: You get to carry around knowledge and communication beyond what anyone in history has ever wielded at the cost of getting interrupted several times a day by default.
SEE ALSO:It's official: Android is out of ideasIt's not just smartphones. Desktop operating systems have borrowed heavily from their mobile counterparts in recent years, bringing with them notifications galore. Even the web itself won't leave us alone: our browsers are continually bothering us to allow some sites and services to send alerts, adding to the cacophony of dings.
The tech industry brought this on itself. John Hermann at the New York Timesdoes an excellent job of pinpointing the origin of the problem, correctly ascertaining the simple reason that every service is sending us red dots: they work. Someone, somewhere is tapping on that badge that just appeared on your lock screen. What other reason would any service send something this ridiculous?

Tweet may have been deleted
The problem has a seemingly simple, if extreme, solution (and one that I've clearly been tempted to do myself): Turn off notifications -- all of them. Tech columnist David Pierce makes a strong case for this, advocating that it "puts you back in control." He's far from alone. Farhad Manjoo at the Times recently decided to get all his news from print for two months and found the freedom from social media and notifications liberating.
All this shut-it-down talk certainly feels empowering: Damn little red bubbles -- you're not the boss of me! Knee-jerk emotions aside, it's also philosophically comforting: Turning off notifications forces you to be more proactive than reactive.
The thing is, sometimes we want to be reactive. If a family member is sending me a message, I want to know as soon as possible, whether it's a crisis or not. I find calendar alerts to be invaluable in helping me stay on schedule. And there are certain things -- individuals I deem important, franchises I'm a fan of, and news sources I trust -- where I genuinely desire (or a least don't mind) hearing about new stuff.
The argument against all this is, "But you'll still get to all that later, just on your own time." First, while that sounds right, it could mean missing out on cultural conversations I want to be a part of. You could question the value of those in the first place, I admit, but then we're veering further into self-help and not an actual tech problem (which, to be clear, does exist).
Second: Would I get to it later? I'm not so sure. "Take on the world, head on, on your terms," is great general life advice, but the day-to-day often doesn't lend itself to such constant invigoration -- at least outside of "Type A" personalities. In other words, for the rest of us, we'll probably never get to it. Though we probably don't want to admit it, we needthe kick in the pants in the moment if we're going to take any action at all.
All of this is not to say push notifications aren't broken -- they are -- but I'll dare to voice an unpopular opinion on the subject: They're worth trying to fix rather than throwing them out altogether.
To do so, I propose a more nuanced look at notifications, recognizing that a text from a loved one isn't the same as a colleague with a routine question, which isn't the same as a suggestion to "rediscover this day." Everyone could probably separate the notifications they get into 3 levels of urgency:
Must have:Texts from family, work projects, actual phone calls would all fall here.
Would be nice: This is stuff you're interested in that isn't life-affecting (including content you've recently interacted with and would like to know about new activity)
Who cares? Unsolicited alerts just mugging for your attention -- all the crap, basically.
It would be great if every app and service recognized this pretty obvious hierarchy of urgency and simply get rid of No. 3 wholesale. That's never going to happen for the same reason email spam will never fully go away: There will always be some percentage of people who respond to the alert, and as long as the service is providing something essential enough that the bulk of users aren't tossing it, some amount of dross will continue.
A straightforward solution is to put the burden on users: customize your notifications so you only get the ones you want. That's great in theory, but in practice few will actually do so. And even if you do take the time to tailor your notifications, there's always the risk that this or that app will get thirsty and tap you on the shoulder about your "burrito crush" or some other such nonsense. The solution needs to be system-wide.
Short of a broad rethinking of notifications in the tech industry, I believe the only solution to the notification problem is... wait for it... AI. I know: It's an overused buzzword, but hear me out: Your phone, laptop, and web browser all know your habits -- which apps you interact with, how long you typically spend in them, which notifications you're likely to respond to, and the way in which you've customized those notifications.
Taking all these signals, your devices could start to massage the notifications you see, regardless of what the originator of the alert wanted to send you. It'd be controversial (you can bet most services won't like the idea) but you could avoid much of the controversy by making the -- let's call it auto-curation -- of push alerts opt-in.
I challenge smartphone makers and platform stewards like Apple, Google, Samsung and others to figure this out. The half-hearted guidelines on push notifications clearly aren't working. Larger solutions are needed, lest the multiplying red bubbles on our devices pass the point of no return and truly become the new spam: something to be eradicated, not fixed.
TopicsAndroidiOS
MashReads Podcast: What makes a good summer read?2026-08-21 12:20
國足再次霸占熱搜榜前兩位 媒體人:國足倒數第一也支持2026-08-21 12:06
廣州隊試水直播帶貨 新業態提升俱樂部造血能力2026-08-21 12:05
馬德興:中國足球各種爭論不在一個平麵上 也難有共識2026-08-21 11:54
Nancy Pelosi warns colleagues after info hacked2026-08-21 11:51
CAS :駁回俄羅斯足協暫緩禁賽的要求 審理期間仍禁賽2026-08-21 11:22
曝曼城為哈蘭德開50萬鎊周薪肥約 超C羅成英超第12026-08-21 11:21
曝大連人招聘主教練李鐵投簡曆 將與黎兵謝暉賈秀全競爭2026-08-21 10:57
MashReads Podcast: What makes a good summer read?2026-08-21 10:21
名宿 :就算同時簽姆巴佩哈蘭德 曼聯也贏不了冠軍2026-08-21 10:04
Xiaomi accused of copying again, this time by Jawbone2026-08-21 12:48
梅西不想回巴薩決定留在巴黎 離開紅藍後再無聯係2026-08-21 12:40
曝有些歸化球員獅子大開口 重回中國足壇可能性不大2026-08-21 12:29
演員李佳航回應質疑 :我說的是不看球還要跟風罵國足的人2026-08-21 12:06
This company is hiring someone just to drink all day2026-08-21 11:38
曝大連人球員汪晉賢加盟亞泰 河南武漢均有新援引進2026-08-21 11:02
鋒無力 ?U23國足蓄勢待發 :我們有默契要靠團隊進球2026-08-21 10:46
久巴拒絕俄羅斯隊征召 因家裏有許多烏克蘭親戚2026-08-21 10:34
Watch MTV's Video Music Awards 2016 livestream2026-08-21 10:19
名記:卡瓦尼決定自由身離開曼聯 下一站首選西甲2026-08-21 10:04