时间:2025-11-22 11:55:29 来源:网络整理编辑:知識
Apparently Facebook hoaxes are still alive and well in the year 2016. An old one is making the round
Apparently Facebook hoaxes are still alive and well in the year 2016.
An old one is making the rounds this week, and everyone really needs to stop freaking out. The hoax tells Facebook users to repost a paragraphs-long status to to ensure their privacy.
The two statuses, per CBS News:
As of September 28th , 2015 at 10:50p.m. Eastern standard time, I do not give Facebook or any entities associated with Facebook permission to use my pictures, information, or posts, both past and future. By this statement, I give notice to Facebook it is strictly forbidden to disclose, copy, distribute, or take any other action against me based on this profile and/or its contents. The content of this profile is private and confidential information. The violation of privacy can be punished by law (UCC 1-308- 1 1 308-103 and the Rome Statute).
NOTE: Facebook is now a public entity. All members must post a note like this. If you prefer, you can copy and paste this version. If you do not publish a statement at least once it will be tactically allowing the use of your photos, as well as the information contained in the profile status updates.
And:
Now it's official! It has been published in the media. Facebook has just released the entry price: £5.99 ($9.10) to keep the subscription of your status to be set to "private." If you paste this message on your page, it will be offered free (I said paste not share) if not tomorrow, all your posts can become public. Even the messages that have been deleted or the photos not allowed. After all, it does not cost anything for a simple copy and paste.
In case you still had questions, no, reposting either of these statuses will not protect you from any Facebook encroachment on your privacy.
According to Snopes, the hoaxes go back to at least 2012. The claim behind the statuses isn't true, Snopessaid, since Facebook does not claim copyright to personal information and has not indicated any plans to make private accounts public.
In any case, posting a status would not counteract the legal agreement every Facebook user must check before signing up for an account.
This time around, people are noticing the statuses and posting to warn others of the hoaxes more quickly than in years past. (Not that that's particularly useful either.)
Maybe endorse a candidate for president instead.
TopicsCybersecurityFacebookPrivacy
These glasses hide a fitness tracker on your face2025-11-22 11:49
Dressage horse dancing to 'Smooth' by Santana wins gold for chillest horse2025-11-22 11:30
Olympic security asks female Iranian fan to drop protest sign2025-11-22 11:19
Florida hurricane forecast remains uncertain, but trends in state's favor2025-11-22 11:12
17 questions you can answer if you're a good communicator2025-11-22 11:02
More than half of women in advertising have faced sexual harassment, report says2025-11-22 10:26
Major earthquake and multiple aftershocks rock central Italy2025-11-22 09:59
Richard Branson 'thought he was going to die' in bike accident2025-11-22 09:40
Here's what 'Game of Thrones' actors get up to between takes2025-11-22 09:13
The Weeknd teases new music in Instagram post2025-11-22 09:10
You can now play 'Solitaire' and 'Tic2025-11-22 11:55
Singapore gets world's first driverless taxis2025-11-22 11:47
Fake news reports from the Newseum are infinitely better than actual news2025-11-22 11:39
Richard Branson 'thought he was going to die' in bike accident2025-11-22 11:34
U.S. pole vaulter skids to a halt for national anthem2025-11-22 11:20
Mall builds real2025-11-22 11:12
Aly Raisman catches Simone Biles napping on a plane like a champion2025-11-22 10:58
Tesla's rumored P100D could make Ludicrous mode even more Ludicrous2025-11-22 10:19
This German startup wants to be your bank (without being a bank)2025-11-22 09:59
Florida hurricane forecast remains uncertain, but trends in state's favor2025-11-22 09:11