时间:2025-10-08 00:02:46 来源:网络整理编辑:綜合
Apparently Facebook hoaxes are still alive and well in the year 2016. An old one is making the round
Apparently Facebook hoaxes are still alive and well in the year 2016.
An old one is making the rounds this week, and everyone really needs to stop freaking out. The hoax tells Facebook users to repost a paragraphs-long status to to ensure their privacy.
The two statuses, per CBS News:
As of September 28th , 2015 at 10:50p.m. Eastern standard time, I do not give Facebook or any entities associated with Facebook permission to use my pictures, information, or posts, both past and future. By this statement, I give notice to Facebook it is strictly forbidden to disclose, copy, distribute, or take any other action against me based on this profile and/or its contents. The content of this profile is private and confidential information. The violation of privacy can be punished by law (UCC 1-308- 1 1 308-103 and the Rome Statute).
NOTE: Facebook is now a public entity. All members must post a note like this. If you prefer, you can copy and paste this version. If you do not publish a statement at least once it will be tactically allowing the use of your photos, as well as the information contained in the profile status updates.
And:
Now it's official! It has been published in the media. Facebook has just released the entry price: £5.99 ($9.10) to keep the subscription of your status to be set to "private." If you paste this message on your page, it will be offered free (I said paste not share) if not tomorrow, all your posts can become public. Even the messages that have been deleted or the photos not allowed. After all, it does not cost anything for a simple copy and paste.
In case you still had questions, no, reposting either of these statuses will not protect you from any Facebook encroachment on your privacy.
According to Snopes, the hoaxes go back to at least 2012. The claim behind the statuses isn't true, Snopessaid, since Facebook does not claim copyright to personal information and has not indicated any plans to make private accounts public.
In any case, posting a status would not counteract the legal agreement every Facebook user must check before signing up for an account.
This time around, people are noticing the statuses and posting to warn others of the hoaxes more quickly than in years past. (Not that that's particularly useful either.)
Maybe endorse a candidate for president instead.
TopicsCybersecurityFacebookPrivacy
Mall builds real2025-10-07 23:55
There's a very good reason to tweet emoji at Google right now2025-10-07 23:53
Trump doesn't need security briefings because he's 'like, a smart person'2025-10-07 23:53
PewDiePie plans to delete his very, very popular YouTube channel Friday2025-10-07 23:51
Snapchat is about to explode in popularity, report says2025-10-07 23:15
Trump doesn't need security briefings because he's 'like, a smart person'2025-10-07 23:10
Vanity Fair just slammed Trump Grill and Donald is not happy about it2025-10-07 22:32
Jerks stole photos from Maisie Williams' private Facebook account2025-10-07 22:26
Whyd voice2025-10-07 22:05
This Christmas card is definitely not what it seems2025-10-07 21:51
This chart shows just how high Simone Biles can jump2025-10-07 23:59
Vanity Fair just slammed Trump Grill and Donald is not happy about it2025-10-07 23:38
Get a sneak peek at January's 'Chicago Fire' and 'P.D.' crossover2025-10-07 23:28
India's largest telecom network Airtel announces plans for free voice calls2025-10-07 22:54
'The Flying Bum' aircraft crashes during second test flight2025-10-07 22:54
Vanity Fair just slammed Trump Grill and Donald is not happy about it2025-10-07 22:26
Environmental activists are being killed. This online platform helps you take action.2025-10-07 22:20
Oculus CEO Brendan Iribe steps down, leaving Facebook's VR future uncertain2025-10-07 21:59
Two states took big steps this week to get rid of the tampon tax2025-10-07 21:33
Journalist tweeted this disgusting Wi2025-10-07 21:31