时间:2026-05-23 13:38:06 来源:网络整理编辑:綜合
Apparently Facebook hoaxes are still alive and well in the year 2016. An old one is making the round
Apparently Facebook hoaxes are still alive and well in the year 2016.
An old one is making the rounds this week, and everyone really needs to stop freaking out. The hoax tells Facebook users to repost a paragraphs-long status to to ensure their privacy.
The two statuses, per CBS News:
As of September 28th , 2015 at 10:50p.m. Eastern standard time, I do not give Facebook or any entities associated with Facebook permission to use my pictures, information, or posts, both past and future. By this statement, I give notice to Facebook it is strictly forbidden to disclose, copy, distribute, or take any other action against me based on this profile and/or its contents. The content of this profile is private and confidential information. The violation of privacy can be punished by law (UCC 1-308- 1 1 308-103 and the Rome Statute).
NOTE: Facebook is now a public entity. All members must post a note like this. If you prefer, you can copy and paste this version. If you do not publish a statement at least once it will be tactically allowing the use of your photos, as well as the information contained in the profile status updates.
And:
Now it's official! It has been published in the media. Facebook has just released the entry price: £5.99 ($9.10) to keep the subscription of your status to be set to "private." If you paste this message on your page, it will be offered free (I said paste not share) if not tomorrow, all your posts can become public. Even the messages that have been deleted or the photos not allowed. After all, it does not cost anything for a simple copy and paste.
In case you still had questions, no, reposting either of these statuses will not protect you from any Facebook encroachment on your privacy.
According to Snopes, the hoaxes go back to at least 2012. The claim behind the statuses isn't true, Snopessaid, since Facebook does not claim copyright to personal information and has not indicated any plans to make private accounts public.
In any case, posting a status would not counteract the legal agreement every Facebook user must check before signing up for an account.
This time around, people are noticing the statuses and posting to warn others of the hoaxes more quickly than in years past. (Not that that's particularly useful either.)
Maybe endorse a candidate for president instead.
TopicsCybersecurityFacebookPrivacy
Pole vaulter claims his penis is not to blame2026-05-23 13:28
Apple is working on a 152026-05-23 13:17
TikTok is reportedly testing a 'Watch History' feature2026-05-23 12:40
What is 'Wordle' hard mode?2026-05-23 11:45
Airbnb activates disaster response site for Louisiana flooding2026-05-23 11:32
Apple launches new Magic Mouse and matching keyboard2026-05-23 11:30
NASA Artemis rocket launch rehearsal delayed2026-05-23 11:20
Google I/O dates announced for May2026-05-23 11:20
Old lady swatting at a cat ends up in Photoshop battle2026-05-23 11:06
Would a Tumblr girl ever buy this $68 'I <3 Tumblr' tee?2026-05-23 10:59
Researchers create temporary tattoos you can use to control your devices2026-05-23 13:28
How to watch the 2022 NBA playoffs without cable2026-05-23 13:22
Jack Dorsey's Block is working on crypto wallet that looks like a rock2026-05-23 13:06
'Elden Ring': 3 easy mistakes new 'Soulsborne' players should avoid2026-05-23 13:05
This company is hiring someone just to drink all day2026-05-23 12:52
'Elden Ring': 3 easy mistakes new 'Soulsborne' players should avoid2026-05-23 12:43
How to watch the 2022 NBA playoffs without cable2026-05-23 11:58
'Wordle' today: Here's the answer for March 292026-05-23 11:24
Singapore rolls out video2026-05-23 11:16
'Windfall' review: A stunning Netflix thriller that keeps you guessing until the very end2026-05-23 11:10