时间:2025-11-22 02:28:55 来源:网络整理编辑:綜合
Apparently Facebook hoaxes are still alive and well in the year 2016. An old one is making the round
Apparently Facebook hoaxes are still alive and well in the year 2016.
An old one is making the rounds this week, and everyone really needs to stop freaking out. The hoax tells Facebook users to repost a paragraphs-long status to to ensure their privacy.
The two statuses, per CBS News:
As of September 28th , 2015 at 10:50p.m. Eastern standard time, I do not give Facebook or any entities associated with Facebook permission to use my pictures, information, or posts, both past and future. By this statement, I give notice to Facebook it is strictly forbidden to disclose, copy, distribute, or take any other action against me based on this profile and/or its contents. The content of this profile is private and confidential information. The violation of privacy can be punished by law (UCC 1-308- 1 1 308-103 and the Rome Statute).
NOTE: Facebook is now a public entity. All members must post a note like this. If you prefer, you can copy and paste this version. If you do not publish a statement at least once it will be tactically allowing the use of your photos, as well as the information contained in the profile status updates.
And:
Now it's official! It has been published in the media. Facebook has just released the entry price: £5.99 ($9.10) to keep the subscription of your status to be set to "private." If you paste this message on your page, it will be offered free (I said paste not share) if not tomorrow, all your posts can become public. Even the messages that have been deleted or the photos not allowed. After all, it does not cost anything for a simple copy and paste.
In case you still had questions, no, reposting either of these statuses will not protect you from any Facebook encroachment on your privacy.
According to Snopes, the hoaxes go back to at least 2012. The claim behind the statuses isn't true, Snopessaid, since Facebook does not claim copyright to personal information and has not indicated any plans to make private accounts public.
In any case, posting a status would not counteract the legal agreement every Facebook user must check before signing up for an account.
This time around, people are noticing the statuses and posting to warn others of the hoaxes more quickly than in years past. (Not that that's particularly useful either.)
Maybe endorse a candidate for president instead.
TopicsCybersecurityFacebookPrivacy
Sound the alarms: Simone Biles finally met Zac Efron2025-11-22 02:17
Justin Trudeau apologizes for wearing brownface in old yearbook photo, calls it racist2025-11-22 02:13
TikTok will be mercifully free of political ads2025-11-22 01:51
Hot Apple rumor: 'iPhone SE 2' could launch next year2025-11-22 01:23
Daughter gives her 1002025-11-22 01:18
Yes, people actually showed up to the Area 51 music festival2025-11-22 01:15
Apple’s new iPhone 11 is so pretty in person. About that bump, though…2025-11-22 00:28
17 times Adele deserved to be crowned Queen of Instagram2025-11-22 00:01
Here's what 'Game of Thrones' actors get up to between takes2025-11-22 00:01
Glenlivet's Tide Pod2025-11-21 23:45
Metallica to seek and destroy your eardrums with new album this fall2025-11-22 02:26
Bluetooth is bad and you should stop using it2025-11-22 02:00
Original 'DOOM' trilogy arrives on Nintendo Switch, PS4, and Xbox One2025-11-22 01:56
Beto O'Rourke wants to remind you that he really loves punk and his wife2025-11-22 01:21
Carlos Beltran made a very interesting hair choice2025-11-22 01:07
'Gears of War 5' review: A highlight of the series2025-11-22 00:52
This is what it's like when a covert image of you goes viral online2025-11-22 00:39
17 times Adele deserved to be crowned Queen of Instagram2025-11-22 00:36
Singapore gets world's first driverless taxis2025-11-22 00:33
Bluetooth is bad and you should stop using it2025-11-22 00:10