时间:2025-08-02 14:05:38 来源:网络整理编辑:時尚
Rose McGowan is not interested in your symbolic protests, Hollywood.On Saturday, McGowan turned her
Rose McGowan is not interested in your symbolic protests, Hollywood.
On Saturday, McGowan turned her attention to Meryl Streep and others who reportedly support a rising push for female actors to attend the upcoming Golden Globes awards show clad in all black. The gesture is intended as a protest of the sexual misconduct that's run rampant through Hollywood for decades.
SEE ALSO:Alyssa Milano slams Matt Damon for his misguided comments on sexual misconductAn incensed McGowan lashed out on Twitter at "actresses, like Meryl Streep," for planning a silent protest.
"YOUR SILENCE is THE problem," McGowan wrote. "You’ll accept a fake award breathlessly & affect no real change. I despise your hypocrisy."
Tweet may have been deleted
She then suggested that the protesters all wear Marchesa, the fashion brand co-founded by Georgina Chapman, as an indirect jab at the protesters. Chapman is married to Harvey Weinstein, the caustic Hollywood producer who allegedly engaged in sexually predatory behavior for decades.
Chapman and Weinstein separated earlier this year, but McGowan's reference to the fashion brand drives her message home: The act of simply attending the Golden Globes, in her mind -- and, it's worth noting, the minds of many others -- makes you complicit with the bad behavior.
Her tweet is all the more striking given the "silent" aspect of this protest. No one has actually come out and explained the intent. The original report, via The Morning Breath, and subsequent confirmations from other outlets, like People, all hinge on anonymous sources.
There's little doubt that some contingent of familiar names is working behind the scenes to make this protest happen. But the apparent unwillingness among them to publicly own this plan -- as evidenced by the anonymous sourcing -- gives added merit to McGowan's take.
The response to her tweet has been decidedly mixed. Some are criticizing McGowan for attacking other women who have made the choice to protest without speaking up. Others agree, and double down by suggesting that not showing up at all would be a more appropriate act of protest.
This is a challenging situation. Who's right and who's wrong is largely a question of perspective. While most can probably agree that pushing back using any resources available against a culture that protects sexual misconduct and reinforces gender inequality is a good thing, a debate like this only proves that it's never as black and white as one side vs. the other.
TopicsActivismFilmGolden GlobesCelebrities
Whyd voice2025-08-02 13:50
Elon Musk and Jack Dorsey agree to conversation about Bitcoin2025-08-02 13:46
How to delete your Gmail account2025-08-02 13:42
The Purge has never been subtle, but the mask is fully off in 'The Forever Purge'2025-08-02 13:38
Samsung Galaxy Note7 teardown reveals the magic behind the phone's iris scanner2025-08-02 13:25
Watch Zaila Avant2025-08-02 13:17
Android's Messages app now has end2025-08-02 12:58
Polestar (sort of) reveals new SUV, its first U.S.2025-08-02 12:40
This 'sh*tpost' bot makes terrible memes so you don't have to2025-08-02 12:22
'Mad Men' star Rich Sommer chats about his role on 'The Office'2025-08-02 11:21
Pole vaulter claims his penis is not to blame2025-08-02 14:05
One single CDN user took down the internet this week2025-08-02 13:54
The most heartwarming reunions and hugs post2025-08-02 13:47
Tesla's in2025-08-02 13:45
17 questions you can answer if you're a good communicator2025-08-02 13:37
Let's talk about that mid2025-08-02 13:11
Jeff Bezos' Blue Origin gets FAA approval to take people to space2025-08-02 12:35
Venmo's $100,000 giveaway is deeply annoying2025-08-02 12:32
Balloon fanatic Tim Kaine is also, of course, very good at harmonica2025-08-02 12:19
Android's Messages app now has end2025-08-02 12:05