您的当前位置:首页 >百科 >【】UPDATE: Sept. 7, 2016, 4:41 p.m. EDT 正文
时间:2025-08-28 02:37:32 来源:网络整理编辑:百科
UPDATE: Sept. 7, 2016, 4:41 p.m. EDT。 A ruling in a different case on Wednesday, Sept. 7 may have ch
UPDATE: Sept. 7, 2016, 4:41 p.m. EDT。
A ruling in a different case on Wednesday, Sept. 7 may have changed the course of Uber's fight over its use of contractors.。
An appeals court ruled that drivers suing over background check practices must fight their cases separately, rather than in a class-action suit. That's because the court upheld an arbitration agreement in the drivers' contracts.。
The ruling could be used to disband the class-action case in O'Connor v. Uber.。
Without the power of a large class-action suit, Uber drivers will be unlikely to win any changes to their status as contractors. 。
A $100 million settlement Uber was ordered to pay to drivers in a class-action lawsuit may not be enough, a judge said Thursday. 。
Uber had agreed to pay $100 million to drivers in California and Massachusetts who sued over their status as contractors, rather than employees.。
Keeping drivers as contractors, not eligible for benefits or other protections for full-time workers, has been instrumental in Uber's astronomical growth and business model. Settling class-action lawsuits over the issue for $100 million allowed Uber to move forward with its business model intact.。
The case has also been closely watched in Silicon Valley due to the possibility that the case will impact the broader on-demand economy. 。
But a judge hinted in June that the settlement might not be enough on Uber's part. And on Thursday U.S. District Court Judge Edward Chen rejected the settlement deal. 。
Thanks for signing up!。
Chen cited a prior ruling from the California Labor Commission that said that Uber had to treat a driver as a full-time employee. 。
Uber could be in line for a bigger financial hit as long as the ruling is upheld and the case moves forward. Chen said in his ruling that the $100 million settlement — $16 million of which was projected based on a future IPO from Uber — was not enough. 。
He pointed to a few reasons, noting that he did believe that "the change to tipping policy will result in 'substantially increased income'" that had been promised. 。
Chen also noted that the $16 million for the IPO could not be considered a reasonable sum as "there is no information on the likelihood that this contingency will be triggered." 。 But it's possible the lawsuit could collapse and Uber would walk away without paying the 385,000 drivers anything, as。 But it's possible the lawsuit could collapse and Uber would walk away without paying the 385,000 drivers anything, as。
Bloomberg 。
pointed out. 。
Uber drivers had previously been under an "arbitration agreement" that meant any lawsuit filed against Uber would be mediated not in a court but rather in arbitration, a private process that is usually quicker and often favors companies. 。
Chen threw out the arbitration agreement, allowing the lawsuit to proceed in court. Uber has appealed that decision, and if it wins, could face a far smaller class-action lawsuit. The lawyer for the drivers has said this would be disastrous for their case and give Uber the upper hand. 。
The judge acknowledged that risk, but did not find it strong enough to uphold the settlement.。
"In addition to this risk to maintaining class action status, as this Court has previously noted, Plaintiffs face risks on the merits of the case. The fundamental question of whether Uber drivers are employees or independent contractors is not a simple one," the judge wrote.。
The ruling comes on the same day Uber said it would roll out its first driverless cars in Pittsburgh. And they won't be able to sue. 。
When reached for comment, an Uber spokesperson emailed the following statement: "The settlement, mutually agreed by both sides, was fair and reasonable. We’re disappointed in this decision and are taking a look at our options."。
This post was updated to reflect the new case ruling that may impact the original story.。
This post was updated to reflect the new case ruling that may impact the original story. 。
The Weeknd teases new music in Instagram post2025-08-28 02:29
意甲舊將 :尤文是時候和C羅分手了 賣他有兩大好處2025-08-28 01:54
天使魔鬼一體!拉梅拉進球+染紅 北倫敦德比曆史第二人2025-08-28 01:36
阿紮爾缺席訓練課!齊達內:他無緣歐冠對陣亞特蘭大2025-08-28 01:15
Snapchat is about to explode in popularity, report says2025-08-28 01:05
廣州隊大概率亮相揭幕戰 賽程編排通過專業軟件完成2025-08-28 00:53
渝媒 :重慶交易阿德裏安一點不虧 與申花各取所需2025-08-28 00:48
顧超:感謝球隊領導和教練組信任 幫助球隊取得好成績2025-08-28 00:38
How Hyperloop One went off the rails2025-08-28 00:12
申花官方宣布阿德裏安租借加盟 重慶隊發文送祝福2025-08-27 23:52
Daughter gives her 1002025-08-28 02:29
申花新援球衣號碼公布 :吳曦選擇12號 阿德裏安9號2025-08-28 02:05
曼聯VS西漢姆前瞻:林皇無緣回家 莫耶斯戰舊主2025-08-28 01:43
阿德裏安 :三年前就渴望加盟申花 希望完成賽季目標2025-08-28 01:14
Michael Phelps says goodbye to the pool with Olympic gold2025-08-28 01:14
李昂加盟可與萊科戰術無縫銜接 杜佳曾拒海港創一紀錄2025-08-28 00:55
董方卓力挺範誌毅:大將軍就是大將軍 我瑞思拜2025-08-28 00:48
又一個八連勝!國米繼續領跑 兩神奇換人改變比賽2025-08-28 00:25
Mom discovers security cameras hacked, kids' bedroom livestreamed2025-08-27 23:54
周金輝赴上海探望國安:目標中超冠軍 保證好國足任務2025-08-27 23:53