时间:2025-05-01 15:36:47 来源:网络整理编辑:熱點
As the 2020 U.S. presidential election inches closer, much of the discourse around misinformation ha
As the 2020 U.S. presidential election inches closer, much of the discourse around misinformation has centered on Facebookand Twitter.
However, there’s one popular platform that’s been missing from the conversation: Wikipedia.
The popular online encyclopedia has become more trusted over the years, yet anyone can edit it. A platform like that should be ripe for misinformation. Yet, the site’s army of volunteer editors have kept the site mostly free from “fake news.” And Wikipedia has already taken some action to maintain the integrity of the site before the election.
Last week, Wikipedia rolled out “extended confirmed protection” on its 2020 United States presidential electionpage, as first noticed by Wired. This classification blocks any users from making edits to this Wikipedia entry unless they have been a registered user for at least 30 days and have made a minimum of 500 edits on the site. The move should stop any newcomers joining the page just to cause havoc by publishing fake results.
Wikipedia administrators will also maintain a “watchlist” of political pages about congressional races, the election pages for each state, and other election-related entries.
A longtime Wikipedia editor told Wiredthat additional protections are expected to roll out as well. For example, the final election results will likely only be sourced by one of the more reputable news outlets, such as the Associated Press. An experienced page administrator will likely be the one granted the power to enter the final results on the page.
A scenario where nefarious users attempt to edit Wikipedia pages with unofficial or even entirely fabricated election results seems entirely plausible, if not expected. Wikipedia is preparing itself for this. We’ll see if it's effective next week.
TopicsSocial MediaElections
The U.S. will no longer have the final say on internet domain names2025-05-01 15:33
Ryan Reynolds' fake Amazon review of his own gin company is as glorious as you'd expect2025-05-01 15:14
Sex toy company Dame is suing the MTA for rejecting its subway ads2025-05-01 15:01
The Boston Red Sox are the latest team to ban 'Fortnite'2025-05-01 14:51
The five guys who climbed Australia's highest mountain, in swimwear2025-05-01 13:53
'Saints Row: The Third' is out for Switch and still so bonkers: Review2025-05-01 13:40
Congress agrees: It's time to regulate facial recognition technology2025-05-01 13:19
This young activist is fighting to keep LGBTQ youth safe from bullying2025-05-01 13:15
Photos show the Blue Cut fire blazing a path of destruction in California2025-05-01 13:10
The chatting dad and baby are back at it again in this adorable Denny's ad2025-05-01 12:52
Tesla's rumored P100D could make Ludicrous mode even more Ludicrous2025-05-01 15:35
On vacation? Please post as many pics as you want.2025-05-01 15:15
Biggest unanswered questions from 'Game of Thrones' Season 8 finale2025-05-01 15:06
'Game of Thrones' followed Emilia Clarke to the Houston Rockets game2025-05-01 14:59
Here's George Takei chilling in zero gravity for the 'Star Trek' anniversary2025-05-01 14:24
What Spider2025-05-01 14:08
Hands on the wheel with Tesla's new in2025-05-01 13:53
How to not get sucked into the online skincare vortex2025-05-01 13:27
Sound the alarms: Simone Biles finally met Zac Efron2025-05-01 13:26
Meet Adam Eli, the gay activist who's changing the world through social media2025-05-01 12:57