时间：2025-05-01 17:38:48 来源：网络整理编辑：探索
The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) might be stepping up the country's AI enforcement mechan
The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) might be stepping up the country's AI enforcement mechanisms, as the organization explores new rules for disclosing the use of AI in political ads.
According to a new Notice of Proposed Rulemaking released this week, the commission is beginning initial investigations into nationwide requirements for labeling AI used in political advertising on TV and radio. The FCC will explore mandates for live, on-air and written AI disclosures and, most divisively, will work to define the scope of "AI-generated content."
Proposed rules could apply to cable operators, satellite TV providers, and radio providers, but would not affect internet streaming services.
"The use of AI is expected to play a substantial role in the creation of political ads in 2024 and beyond, but the use of AI-generated content in political ads also creates a potential for providing deceptive information to voters, in particular, the potential use of 'deep fakes' – altered images, videos, or audio recordings that depict people doing or saying things that did not actually do or say, or events that did not actually occur," the FCC writes. The rules would leverage powers provided to the FCC via the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act.
FCC chairwoman Jessica Rosenworcel called on fellow regulators to explore AI safety in the proposal's news release, writing, "As artificial intelligence tools become more accessible, the Commission wants to make sure consumers are fully informed when the technology is used. Today, I’ve shared with my colleagues a proposal that makes clear consumers have a right to know when AI tools are being used in the political ads they see, and I hope they swiftly act on this issue.”
Notably, the FCC's proposal isn't exploring an outright ban of AI-altered content in political advertising, despite growing concern, and the proposed rule making process will not result in a finalized set of requirements for at least several months.
Until then, the onus for AI labeling sits with individual companies and AI developers themselves.
TopicsArtificial IntelligenceFCCSocial GoodPolitics
Slack goes down again, prompting anxiety everywhere2025-05-01 17:36
Balloon fanatic Tim Kaine is also, of course, very good at harmonica2025-05-01 17:34
U.S. government issues warning on McDonald's recalled wearable devices2025-05-01 17:31
Tributes flow after death of former Singapore president S.R. Nathan2025-05-01 17:20
Dog elected for third term as mayor of Minnesota town2025-05-01 17:10
Old lady swatting at a cat ends up in Photoshop battle2025-05-01 17:00
Give your kitchen sponge a rest on this adorable bed2025-05-01 16:21
17 questions you can answer if you're a good communicator2025-05-01 15:26
The U.S. will no longer have the final say on internet domain names2025-05-01 15:15
Photos show the Blue Cut fire blazing a path of destruction in California2025-05-01 15:11
Two states took big steps this week to get rid of the tampon tax2025-05-01 17:27
Xiaomi accused of copying again, this time by Jawbone2025-05-01 17:21
Honda's all2025-05-01 17:18
Twitter grants everyone access to quality filter for tweet notifications2025-05-01 17:08
Wikipedia co2025-05-01 16:45
PlayStation Now game streaming is coming to PC2025-05-01 16:44
Photos show the Blue Cut fire blazing a path of destruction in California2025-05-01 16:01
Dramatic photo captures nun texting friends after Italy earthquake2025-05-01 15:14
Tesla's rumored P100D could make Ludicrous mode even more Ludicrous2025-05-01 15:00
Tesla's rumored P100D could make Ludicrous mode even more Ludicrous2025-05-01 15:00
