时间:2025-08-02 18:57:46 来源:网络整理编辑:探索
The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) might be stepping up the country's AI enforcement mechan
The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) might be stepping up the country's AI enforcement mechanisms, as the organization explores new rules for disclosing the use of AI in political ads.
According to a new Notice of Proposed Rulemaking released this week, the commission is beginning initial investigations into nationwide requirements for labeling AI used in political advertising on TV and radio. The FCC will explore mandates for live, on-air and written AI disclosures and, most divisively, will work to define the scope of "AI-generated content."
Proposed rules could apply to cable operators, satellite TV providers, and radio providers, but would not affect internet streaming services.
"The use of AI is expected to play a substantial role in the creation of political ads in 2024 and beyond, but the use of AI-generated content in political ads also creates a potential for providing deceptive information to voters, in particular, the potential use of 'deep fakes' – altered images, videos, or audio recordings that depict people doing or saying things that did not actually do or say, or events that did not actually occur," the FCC writes. The rules would leverage powers provided to the FCC via the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act.
FCC chairwoman Jessica Rosenworcel called on fellow regulators to explore AI safety in the proposal's news release, writing, "As artificial intelligence tools become more accessible, the Commission wants to make sure consumers are fully informed when the technology is used. Today, I’ve shared with my colleagues a proposal that makes clear consumers have a right to know when AI tools are being used in the political ads they see, and I hope they swiftly act on this issue.”
Notably, the FCC's proposal isn't exploring an outright ban of AI-altered content in political advertising, despite growing concern, and the proposed rule making process will not result in a finalized set of requirements for at least several months.
Until then, the onus for AI labeling sits with individual companies and AI developers themselves.
TopicsArtificial IntelligenceFCCSocial GoodPolitics
Richard Branson 'thought he was going to die' in bike accident2025-08-02 18:11
Dan Levy announces 'Schitt's Creek' to end with sixth and final season2025-08-02 18:04
We regret to inform you that this brand tweet about St. Louis food is funny2025-08-02 17:51
Chunky baby seal born in Japan. Look at him, love him.2025-08-02 17:41
Samsung Galaxy Note7 teardown reveals the magic behind the phone's iris scanner2025-08-02 17:36
Mozilla launches Firefox Send, a free self2025-08-02 17:30
Wow, budget airline WOW Air is just done2025-08-02 17:09
The US urges Germany to reject Huawei's bid for its 5G network2025-08-02 16:32
The U.S. will no longer have the final say on internet domain names2025-08-02 16:24
AOC obliterates claim that fighting climate change is 'elitist' in stirring speech2025-08-02 16:17
How Hyperloop One went off the rails2025-08-02 18:51
5 bizarre facts about Elizabeth Holmes 'The Inventor' left out2025-08-02 18:27
People still fear self2025-08-02 18:13
Chunky baby seal born in Japan. Look at him, love him.2025-08-02 18:06
Nate Parker is finally thinking about the woman who accused him of rape2025-08-02 17:23
Robert Downey Jr. sparks 'Avengers' battle over who has the best 'stache2025-08-02 17:20
Microsoft takes a stand against corporate April Fools' jokes2025-08-02 17:11
People still fear self2025-08-02 17:07
Pokémon Go is so big that it has its own VR porn parody now2025-08-02 16:58
Slack removes more than two dozen accounts tied to hate groups2025-08-02 16:53