时间:2025-08-02 20:17:42 来源:网络整理编辑:探索
Evernote has decided to "revisit" its controversial privacy policy following a swift backlash from i
Evernote has decided to "revisit" its controversial privacy policy following a swift backlash from its users.。
In a statement on the company's blog, Evernote said it would no longer be implementing the privacy policy it had previously announced and that its machine learning updates, which necessitated some employees read portions of user notes, would be solely opt-in.。
SEE ALSO:Evernote won't let you opt out of employees reading parts of your notes。The update comes one day after Evernote CEO Chris O'Neill said the company "communicated poorly" about the proposed changes but didn't back away from the changes, which he said would improve the company's note taking software.。
"We will be revising our existing Privacy Policy to address our customers’ concerns, reinforce that their data remains private by default, and confirm the trust they have placed in Evernote is well founded," the company said in an update posted by Evernote's senior director of communications, Greg Chiemingo. 。
"In addition, we will make machine learning technologies available to our users, but no employees will be reading note content as part of this process unless users opt in."。
Thanks for signing up!。
In an effort to improve its machine learning technology, Evernote had said that some employees would be able to view portions of users' notes for quality control. O'Neill later clarified that personally identifying information would be hidden, but the explanation did little to reassure the privacy conscious.。
While the latest update will no doubt come as welcome news, it raises the question of whether it is too little too late. As others have pointed out, Evernote can still gain access to users' notes in certain circumstances, like complying with a warrant from a law enforcement agency. 。
And while a promise to "revisit" its policies is a step in the right direction, without thoroughly explaining the alternatives, it's difficult to assess whether this is a short term fix to a publicity problem or the beginner of a longer term commitment to protecting user privacy.。
By making its original changes opt-out only, so that users would automatically be enrolled into the new features unless they changed their account settings, the company sent a message -- intended or not -- that its technology was more important than its users privacy. That's not something that can be easily undone with an apologetic blog post.。
Singapore rolls out video2025-08-02 20:10
Wordle today: The answer and hints for May 152025-08-02 20:04
[Update] T2025-08-02 19:32
Best Star Wars Day deals 2024: LEGO sets, Xbox games, and more2025-08-02 19:01
Xiaomi accused of copying again, this time by Jawbone2025-08-02 19:00
蘆薈幹茶的功效與作用2025-08-02 18:53
【波盈足球】 足球巴西明星後衛 前隊長阿維斯涉性侵被捕 ( 巴西,巴塞隆納 )2025-08-02 18:37
King Charles portrait has the internet aghast: See the reactions2025-08-02 18:31
Man stumbles upon his phone background in real life2025-08-02 18:20
梅西缺席訓練!義烏接到阿根廷“奪冠球衣”訂單!葡萄牙主教練下課 ,穆裏尼奧或將接手(梅西的訓練)2025-08-02 18:09
Two states took big steps this week to get rid of the tampon tax2025-08-02 20:15
NYT's The Mini crossword answers for May 42025-08-02 20:01
鈣爾奇60粒多少錢一瓶2025-08-02 20:00
How to set up Siri on your iPhone2025-08-02 19:51
Two states took big steps this week to get rid of the tampon tax2025-08-02 19:38
藤茶的功效與作用圖片2025-08-02 19:30
英聯杯 :紐卡斯爾聯占據晉級先機 ,南安普敦多線作戰體能受損2025-08-02 19:27
詹姆斯後,現役得分能突破3萬的球員:2人基本實現,3人理論可能(眾球星對詹姆斯的評價)2025-08-02 19:21
Olympic security asks female Iranian fan to drop protest sign2025-08-02 18:35
英吉利dha藻油夾心軟糖怎麽樣2025-08-02 17:34