时间:2026-04-19 08:55:44 来源:网络整理编辑:綜合
Apparently Facebook hoaxes are still alive and well in the year 2016. An old one is making the round
Apparently Facebook hoaxes are still alive and well in the year 2016.
An old one is making the rounds this week, and everyone really needs to stop freaking out. The hoax tells Facebook users to repost a paragraphs-long status to to ensure their privacy.
The two statuses, per CBS News:
As of September 28th , 2015 at 10:50p.m. Eastern standard time, I do not give Facebook or any entities associated with Facebook permission to use my pictures, information, or posts, both past and future. By this statement, I give notice to Facebook it is strictly forbidden to disclose, copy, distribute, or take any other action against me based on this profile and/or its contents. The content of this profile is private and confidential information. The violation of privacy can be punished by law (UCC 1-308- 1 1 308-103 and the Rome Statute).
NOTE: Facebook is now a public entity. All members must post a note like this. If you prefer, you can copy and paste this version. If you do not publish a statement at least once it will be tactically allowing the use of your photos, as well as the information contained in the profile status updates.
And:
Now it's official! It has been published in the media. Facebook has just released the entry price: £5.99 ($9.10) to keep the subscription of your status to be set to "private." If you paste this message on your page, it will be offered free (I said paste not share) if not tomorrow, all your posts can become public. Even the messages that have been deleted or the photos not allowed. After all, it does not cost anything for a simple copy and paste.
In case you still had questions, no, reposting either of these statuses will not protect you from any Facebook encroachment on your privacy.
According to Snopes, the hoaxes go back to at least 2012. The claim behind the statuses isn't true, Snopessaid, since Facebook does not claim copyright to personal information and has not indicated any plans to make private accounts public.
In any case, posting a status would not counteract the legal agreement every Facebook user must check before signing up for an account.
This time around, people are noticing the statuses and posting to warn others of the hoaxes more quickly than in years past. (Not that that's particularly useful either.)
Maybe endorse a candidate for president instead.
TopicsCybersecurityFacebookPrivacy
Nancy Pelosi warns colleagues after info hacked2026-04-19 08:47
Best cordless vacuum deal: Act fast to get the eufy by Anker HomeVac S11 Go for $100.90.2026-04-19 08:32
Grubhub coupon code for October 2023: Save 25% off eight delivery orders between Oct. 102026-04-19 08:24
Urban Outfitters is selling original iPods for hundreds of dollars2026-04-19 07:48
Michael Phelps says goodbye to the pool with Olympic gold2026-04-19 07:29
'Saw X' review: A surprisingly sentimental splatter2026-04-19 07:24
'Ahsoka' was pro Star Wars with an amateur script2026-04-19 07:17
'Ahsoka' was pro Star Wars with an amateur script2026-04-19 07:14
Carlos Beltran made a very interesting hair choice2026-04-19 06:38
'The Marvels' did Aladna wrong2026-04-19 06:35
The U.S. will no longer have the final say on internet domain names2026-04-19 08:47
Microsoft Edge uninstall from Windows now possible – but only if you live here2026-04-19 08:19
Best Apple deal: 9th gen iPad on sale for $2492026-04-19 07:48
Wordle today: The answer and hints for November 232026-04-19 07:19
Did our grandparents have the best beauty advice?2026-04-19 07:02
Wildlife photographer of the year 2023 captures the variety of nature2026-04-19 06:54
Best VPN deal: NordVPN's Black Friday deal is live2026-04-19 06:54
WhatsApp under fire for AI2026-04-19 06:20
How Hyperloop One went off the rails2026-04-19 06:17
Should I go to a sex therapist?2026-04-19 06:12