时间:2025-09-16 23:24:34 来源:网络整理编辑:熱點
Apparently Facebook hoaxes are still alive and well in the year 2016. An old one is making the round
Apparently Facebook hoaxes are still alive and well in the year 2016.
An old one is making the rounds this week, and everyone really needs to stop freaking out. The hoax tells Facebook users to repost a paragraphs-long status to to ensure their privacy.
The two statuses, per CBS News:
As of September 28th , 2015 at 10:50p.m. Eastern standard time, I do not give Facebook or any entities associated with Facebook permission to use my pictures, information, or posts, both past and future. By this statement, I give notice to Facebook it is strictly forbidden to disclose, copy, distribute, or take any other action against me based on this profile and/or its contents. The content of this profile is private and confidential information. The violation of privacy can be punished by law (UCC 1-308- 1 1 308-103 and the Rome Statute).
NOTE: Facebook is now a public entity. All members must post a note like this. If you prefer, you can copy and paste this version. If you do not publish a statement at least once it will be tactically allowing the use of your photos, as well as the information contained in the profile status updates.
And:
Now it's official! It has been published in the media. Facebook has just released the entry price: £5.99 ($9.10) to keep the subscription of your status to be set to "private." If you paste this message on your page, it will be offered free (I said paste not share) if not tomorrow, all your posts can become public. Even the messages that have been deleted or the photos not allowed. After all, it does not cost anything for a simple copy and paste.
In case you still had questions, no, reposting either of these statuses will not protect you from any Facebook encroachment on your privacy.
According to Snopes, the hoaxes go back to at least 2012. The claim behind the statuses isn't true, Snopessaid, since Facebook does not claim copyright to personal information and has not indicated any plans to make private accounts public.
In any case, posting a status would not counteract the legal agreement every Facebook user must check before signing up for an account.
This time around, people are noticing the statuses and posting to warn others of the hoaxes more quickly than in years past. (Not that that's particularly useful either.)
Maybe endorse a candidate for president instead.
TopicsCybersecurityFacebookPrivacy
Tyler, the Creator helped Frank Ocean celebrate 'Blonde' release in a delicious way2025-09-16 23:23
England vs Senegal livestream: How to watch World Cup Round of 16 live2025-09-16 23:20
It looks like China does have access to U.S. TikTok user data2025-09-16 23:11
South Korea vs Ghana livestream: How to watch FIFA World Cup Group H live2025-09-16 22:44
This coloring book is here for all your relationship goals2025-09-16 22:18
Wordle today: Here's the answer, hints for October 262025-09-16 21:59
Wordle today: Here's the answer, hints for December 182025-09-16 21:58
How 'She2025-09-16 21:39
This chart shows just how high Simone Biles can jump2025-09-16 21:22
Twitter has posted its first edited tweet2025-09-16 21:05
Early Apple2025-09-16 23:20
Twitter has posted its first edited tweet2025-09-16 23:04
23 best free iPhone apps, according to Reddit2025-09-16 23:00
Wordle today: Here's the answer, hints for October 312025-09-16 22:16
Katy Perry talks 'Rise,' her next batch of songs, and how to survive Twitter2025-09-16 22:15
Twitter might let users put videos behind a paywall2025-09-16 21:33
Twitter employees who replied to one of Elon Musk's tweets were fired2025-09-16 21:29
Elon Musk has fired even more Twitter workers2025-09-16 21:26
Australian football makes history with first LGBT Pride Game2025-09-16 21:12
Twitter may charge users $20 per month to be verified2025-09-16 21:02