时间:2025-09-17 16:38:16 来源:网络整理编辑:休閑
Apparently Facebook hoaxes are still alive and well in the year 2016. An old one is making the round
Apparently Facebook hoaxes are still alive and well in the year 2016.
An old one is making the rounds this week, and everyone really needs to stop freaking out. The hoax tells Facebook users to repost a paragraphs-long status to to ensure their privacy.
The two statuses, per CBS News:
As of September 28th , 2015 at 10:50p.m. Eastern standard time, I do not give Facebook or any entities associated with Facebook permission to use my pictures, information, or posts, both past and future. By this statement, I give notice to Facebook it is strictly forbidden to disclose, copy, distribute, or take any other action against me based on this profile and/or its contents. The content of this profile is private and confidential information. The violation of privacy can be punished by law (UCC 1-308- 1 1 308-103 and the Rome Statute).
NOTE: Facebook is now a public entity. All members must post a note like this. If you prefer, you can copy and paste this version. If you do not publish a statement at least once it will be tactically allowing the use of your photos, as well as the information contained in the profile status updates.
And:
Now it's official! It has been published in the media. Facebook has just released the entry price: £5.99 ($9.10) to keep the subscription of your status to be set to "private." If you paste this message on your page, it will be offered free (I said paste not share) if not tomorrow, all your posts can become public. Even the messages that have been deleted or the photos not allowed. After all, it does not cost anything for a simple copy and paste.
In case you still had questions, no, reposting either of these statuses will not protect you from any Facebook encroachment on your privacy.
According to Snopes, the hoaxes go back to at least 2012. The claim behind the statuses isn't true, Snopessaid, since Facebook does not claim copyright to personal information and has not indicated any plans to make private accounts public.
In any case, posting a status would not counteract the legal agreement every Facebook user must check before signing up for an account.
This time around, people are noticing the statuses and posting to warn others of the hoaxes more quickly than in years past. (Not that that's particularly useful either.)
Maybe endorse a candidate for president instead.
TopicsCybersecurityFacebookPrivacy
Mall builds real2025-09-17 16:36
Man breaks into escape room, then can't actually escape2025-09-17 16:19
McDonald's is ditching plastic straws in Australia too2025-09-17 15:53
YouTube is making hashtags more visible — but it’s still missing the point2025-09-17 15:21
Airbnb activates disaster response site for Louisiana flooding2025-09-17 15:19
'Blind' robot dog can hunt you even on a moonless night2025-09-17 15:00
'The Walking Dead: Our World' mobile game review: Fun times, bad AR2025-09-17 14:47
'Making a Murderer' case will not be heard by Supreme Court2025-09-17 14:28
Daughter gives her 1002025-09-17 14:16
Nintendo's president drops some hints about the next 3DS2025-09-17 14:12
Olympics official on Rio's green diving pool: 'Chemistry is not an exact science'2025-09-17 16:15
Nintendo's president drops some hints about the next 3DS2025-09-17 16:10
Boeing hypersonic jet could make for 2 hour transatlantic flights2025-09-17 16:03
Dark Knight 10th Anniversary: Film will return to IMAX theaters2025-09-17 15:27
This German startup wants to be your bank (without being a bank)2025-09-17 15:11
'Making a Murderer' case will not be heard by Supreme Court2025-09-17 14:35
Making tech truly diverse calls for new tactics and renewed commitment2025-09-17 14:32
Trump supporters boycott Walmart for selling 'Impeach 45' merch2025-09-17 14:30
Carlos Beltran made a very interesting hair choice2025-09-17 14:00
What's coming to Hulu in August 20182025-09-17 13:53