时间:2025-05-01 15:24:50 来源:网络整理编辑:熱點
Alexa Answers is somehow turning out even worse than expected. The program, launched in September, g
Alexa Answers is somehow turning out even worse than expected.
The program, launched in September, gives any idiot off the streets of the U.S. the chance to answer real questions posed to Amazon's Alexa smart assistant by actual people. As any thinking internet user might have expected, just over a month into the service those answers range from unintentionally inaccurate, to deliberate trolling, to calculated misinformation.
According to Amazon, here's how Alexa Answers is supposed to work: "Discover questions Alexa doesn't have an answer for, submit your own and share them with the world."
And by share them, Amazon means you'll have your answer actually read aloud to real people by their smart assistant.
In exchange for this decidedly unpaid labor, contributors are rewarded with "points." It's perhaps unsurprising, then, that the old aphorism "you get what you pay for" applies.
Take one question and answer combo, viewable at the time of this writing on the Alexa Answers "community answers" page.
"What are mold pigs," reads the question posed by some Alexa user, somewhere. The correct answer, at least according to an Oct. 9 CNN story, is "a new family, genus and species of microinvertebrates that lived during the mid-Tertiary period."
The Alexa Answers answer, "currently being shared with Alexa customers," reads quite differently.
"Mold pigs are overweight animals, usually with green or purple hair and an unpleasant demeanor. Their usual habitat is west-coast university campuses."
This, obviously, is someone trolling Alexa users. All in all, it's relatively harmless — even if it is wrong. However, according to a deep dive by VentureBeat, this is just the tip of the rapidly melting iceberg.
One example surfaced by the publication especially stands out. The question, "why are cows bad for the environment," was put to Alexa Answers users. While there are numerous, nuanced ways to answer this question, Alexa Answers takes a different approach.
"Cows are no more harmful for the environment than any other animal," reads one Alexa Answers response. "The 'cow farts' theory is a made-up theory by climate change radicals."
In case you're actually curious, the World Resources Institute has a detailed explanation of how beef production and consumption contributes to climate change. It does not involve the phrase "made-up theory."
SEE ALSO:Now any idiot off the street can answer your dumb Alexa questionsVentureBeat also discovered at least one instance of what appears to be product placement masquerading as a helpful answer. Likely, that is not an isolated instance.
That a for-profit corporation's attempt to crowdsource free labor backfired shouldn't come as a surprise to any thinking person. Why Amazon thought any of this would work out well, on the other hand, is a different question — one that even a trolling Alexa Answers user could have likely answered with a hearty "no way in hell."
TopicsAlexaAmazon
Fake news reports from the Newseum are infinitely better than actual news2025-05-01 15:24
官方 :外援福布斯、維亞納 、卡耶維奇加盟武漢長江隊2025-05-01 14:58
津媒:升班馬陣容不遜老牌球隊 申花窘迫讓人唏噓2025-05-01 14:46
三連敗預定 ?曼聯僅剩15人可戰切爾西 替補席就4人2025-05-01 14:10
Dog elected for third term as mayor of Minnesota town2025-05-01 14:08
曼城的流暢皇馬的堅韌 這場歐冠半決賽是足球的活廣告2025-05-01 14:04
亞冠聯賽西亞大區8強產生 沙特3隊晉級勢頭最猛2025-05-01 13:57
安帥點出皇馬次回合取勝之匙 揚言再次燃爆伯納烏2025-05-01 13:11
What brands need to know about virtual reality2025-05-01 13:05
過癮 !曼城皇馬演進球大戰 歐冠官方直呼足球最棒2025-05-01 12:56
Daughter gives her 1002025-05-01 15:22
辟謠!醫生證實拉伊奧拉還活著 目前身體狀況糟糕2025-05-01 14:56
三連敗預定 ?曼聯僅剩15人可戰切爾西 替補席就4人2025-05-01 14:56
深圳隊4外援陣容確認 瓦卡索5月底或與球隊匯合2025-05-01 14:56
Sound the alarms: Simone Biles finally met Zac Efron2025-05-01 14:49
廣州隊超低控球率難換1分 門將再送世界級撲救2025-05-01 14:31
記者:法乙球隊邀戴偉浚前去試訓 能否成行存較大未知數2025-05-01 14:04
戴偉浚代理律師曬截圖 稱將簽約海外俱樂部2025-05-01 13:02
'The Flying Bum' aircraft crashes during second test flight2025-05-01 12:54
德轉朱藝:廣州隊球員高準翼轉會加盟武漢三鎮2025-05-01 12:45